Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489080›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Disruption of the Na+ ion binding site as a mechanism for positive allosteric modulation of the mu-opioid receptor.

Kathryn E Livingston, John R Traynor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular mechanism of allosteric modulation of opioid receptors.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in the structural understanding of opioid allostery.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Positive allosteric modulation of the mu-opioid receptor produces analgesia with reduced side effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn E LivingstonDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
John R TraynorDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 jtraynor@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

SUBSTANCE ABUSE INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007267 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GNEGY, MARGARET E · 1994 to 2015
$4.5M
Regulator of G protein signaling proteins differentially control opioid analgesiaR01DA035316 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TRAYNOR, JOHN R. · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035316NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive allosteric modulation of the mu-opioid receptor (MOPr), the site of action of all clinically used opioids, represents a potential approach for the management of pain. We recently reported on positive allosteric modulators of MOPr (mu-PAMs), a class A G protein coupled receptor (GPCR). This study was designed to examine the mechanism of allostery by comparing the degree to which opioid ligand structure governs modulation. To do this we examined the interaction of the mu-PAM, BMS-986122, with a chemically diverse range of MOPr orthosteric ligands. Generally, for full agonists BMS-986122 enhanced the binding affinity and potency to activate G protein with no alteration in the maximal effect. In contrast, lower efficacy agonists including morphine were insensitive to alterations in binding affinity and showed little to no change in potency to stimulate G protein. Instead, there was an increase in maximal G protein stimulation. Antagonists were unresponsive to the modulatory effects of BMS-986122. Sodium is a known endogenous allosteric modulator of MOPr and alters orthosteric agonist affinity and efficacy. The sensitivity of an orthosteric ligand to BMS-986122 was strongly correlated with its sensitivity to NaCl. In addition, BMS-986122 decreased the ability of NaCl to modulate agonist binding in an allosteric fashion. Overall, BMS-986122 displayed marked probe dependence that was based upon the efficacy of the orthosteric ligand and can be explained using the Monod-Wyman-Changeux two-state model of allostery. Furthermore, disruption of the Na(+) ion binding site may represent a common mechanism for allosteric modulation of class A GPCRs.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsBinding SitesCell Line, TumorNarcotic AntagonistsRatsReceptors, Opioid, muSodiumSulfonesAnalgesics, OpioidBMS-986122Narcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioid, muSodiumSulfonesendogenous opioidsGTPgammaSligand bindingopiatesreceptor states

Identifiers

PMID25489080
PMCPMC4280615
OpenAlexW2024187762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.