Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489034›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2014

Lessons for providers and hospitals from Philadelphia's obstetric services closures and consolidations, 1997-2012.

Scott A Lorch, Ashley E Martin, Richa Ranade, Sindhu K Srinivas, David Grande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Assuring safe patient care in a level III NICU in anticipation of hospital closure.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  8. Comparison of state risk-appropriate neonatal care policies with the 2012 AAP policy statement.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  9. Safety of labour and delivery following closures of obstetric services in small community hospitals.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Impacts of Health Care Industry Consolidation in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: A Qualitative Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
  12. Maternity Care Deserts and Pregnancy-Associated Mortality in Louisiana.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott A LorchScott A. Lorch (lorch@email.chop.edu) is an associate professor of pediatrics at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania.
Ashley E MartinAshley E. Martin is project manager in the Center for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Richa RanadeRicha Ranade is a research assistant in the Center for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Sindhu K SrinivasSindhu K. Srinivas is an assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia.
David GrandeDavid Grande is an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

Impact of Obstetric Unit Closures on Pregnancy OutcomesR01HS018661 · AHRQ · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI LORCH, SCOTT A · 2010 to 2013
$1.9M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS018661AHRQ HHS R01HS018661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act is triggering an increase in hospital consolidation and mergers. How other hospitals respond to these disruptions in supply could influence patient outcomes. We examined the experience of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (coterminous with the city of Philadelphia), where thirteen of nineteen hospital obstetric units closed between 1997 and 2012. Between October 2011 and January 2012 we interviewed twenty-three key informants from eleven hospitals (six urban and five suburban) whose obstetric units remained open, to understand how the large number of closures affected their operations. Informants reported having confronted numerous challenges as a result of the obstetric unit closures, including sharp surges in delivery volume and an increase in the proportion of patients with public insurance or no insurance. Informants reported adopting a number of strategies, such as innovative staffing models, to cope with the added demand brought about by the closure of nearby obstetric units. Informants emphasized that interhospital communication could mitigate closures' stresses on the health care system. Our study supports the need for policy makers to anticipate reductions in supply and monitor patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricHealth Facility ClosureHealth Facility MergerHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthInterviews as TopicObstetrics and Gynecology Department, HospitalPhiladelphiaMaternal And Child HealthOrganization and Delivery of Care

Identifiers

PMID25489034
PMCPMC10795747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.