Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25488416›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2015

Genomic selection prediction accuracy in a perennial crop: case study of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.).

David Cros, Marie Denis, Leopoldo Sánchez, Benoit Cochard, Albert Flori, Tristan Durand-Gasselin, Bruno Nouy, Alphonse Omoré, Virginie Pomiès, Virginie Riou and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: I. Optimizing the training set design.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Genomic selection for morphological and yield-related traits using genome-wide SNPs in oil palm.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic selection in tropical perennial crops and plantation trees: a review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David CrosCIRAD, UMR AGAP (Genetic Improvement and Adaptation of Mediterranean and Tropical Plants Research Unit), 34398, Montpellier, France, david.cros@cirad.fr.
Marie Denis
Leopoldo Sánchez
Benoit Cochard
Albert Flori
Tristan Durand-Gasselin
Bruno Nouy
Alphonse Omoré
Virginie Pomiès
Virginie Riou
Edyana Suryana
Jean-Marc Bouvet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageGenomic selection empirically appeared valuable for reciprocal recurrent selection in oil palm as it could account for family effects and Mendelian sampling terms, despite small populations and low marker density. Genomic selection (GS) can increase the genetic gain in plants. In perennial crops, this is expected mainly through shortened breeding cycles and increased selection intensity, which requires sufficient GS accuracy in selection candidates, despite often small training populations. Our objective was to obtain the first empirical estimate of GS accuracy in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis), the major world oil crop. We used two parental populations involved in conventional reciprocal recurrent selection (Deli and Group B) with 131 individuals each, genotyped with 265 SSR. We estimated within-population GS accuracies when predicting breeding values of non-progeny-tested individuals for eight yield traits. We used three methods to sample training sets and five statistical methods to estimate genomic breeding values. The results showed that GS could account for family effects and Mendelian sampling terms in Group B but only for family effects in Deli. Presumably, this difference between populations originated from their contrasting breeding history. The GS accuracy ranged from -0.41 to 0.94 and was positively correlated with the relationship between training and test sets. Training sets optimized with the so-called CDmean criterion gave the highest accuracies, ranging from 0.49 (pulp to fruit ratio in Group B) to 0.94 (fruit weight in Group B). The statistical methods did not affect the accuracy. Finally, Group B could be preselected for progeny tests by applying GS to key yield traits, therefore increasing the selection intensity. Our results should be valuable for breeding programs with small populations, long breeding cycles, or reduced effective size.

Indexed as

BreedingSelection, GeneticArecaceaeGenetics, PopulationGenotypeMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticModels, Statistical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.