ArticlePharmaceutical research2015
New Techniques to Assess In Vitro Release of siRNA from Nanoscale Polyplexes.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overview of polymeric polyplexes for dsRNA delivery in insects: complexation, stability, and design considerations.Frontiers in insect science · 2026Review
- Rational design of multistage drug delivery vehicles for pulmonary RNA interference therapy.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- Live cell imaging of duplex siRNA intracellular trafficking.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRelease of siRNA from nanoscale polyplexes is a crucial yet little investigated process, important during all stages of therapeutic research. Here we develop new methods to characterize polyplex stability early on in the development of new materials.
methodsWe used double fluorescent labeled siRNA to compare binding and stability of a panel of chemically highly diverse nanoscale polyplexes, including peptides, lipids, nanohydrogels, poly-L-lysine brushes, HPMA block copolymers and manganese oxide particles. Conventional EMSA and heparin competition methods were contrasted with a newly developed microscale thermophoresis (MST) assay, a near-equilibrium method that allows free choice of buffer conditions. Integrity of FRET-labeled siRNA was monitored in the presence of nucleases, in cell culture medium and inside living cells. This approach characterizes all relevant steps from polyplex stability, over uptake to in vitro knockdown capability.
resultsDiverging polyplex binding properties revealed drawbacks of conventional EMSA and heparin competition assays, where MST and FRET-based siRNA integrity measurements offered a better discrimination of differential binding strength. Since cell culture medium left siRNA in all polyplexes essentially intact, the relevant degradation events could be pinpointed to occur inside cells. Differential binding strength of the variegated polyplexes correlated only partially with intracellular degradation. The most successful compounds in RNAi showed intermediate binding strength in our assays.
conclusionsWe introduce new methods for the efficient and informative characterization of siRNA polyplexes with special attention to stability. Comparing FRET-labeled siRNA in different polyplexes associates successful knockdown with intermediate siRNA stability in various steps from formulation to intracellular persistence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.