Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25487797›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Limited-sampling strategies for anidulafungin in critically ill patients.

Marjolijn J P van Wanrooy, Johannes H Proost, Michael G G Rodgers, Jan G Zijlstra, Donald R A Uges, Jos G W Kosterink, Tjip S van der Werf, Jan-Willem C Alffenaar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01047267 (Pharmacokinetics of Anidulafungin in Critically Ill Patients With Invasive Candidiasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01047267 completednot on this map

Pharmacokinetics of Anidulafungin in Critically Ill Patients With Invasive Candidiasis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2010 to 2011Enrolled20ConditionsInvasive Candidiasis, Critically Ill
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marjolijn J P van WanrooyUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johannes H ProostUniversity of Groningen, Department of Pharmacy, Section Pharmacokinetics, Toxicology and Targeting, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michael G G RodgersUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Critical Care, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan G ZijlstraUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Critical Care, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Donald R A UgesUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jos G W KosterinkUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands University of Groningen, Department of Pharmacy, Section Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tjip S van der WerfUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan-Willem C AlffenaarUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands j.w.c.alffenaar@umcg.nl.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficacy of anidulafungin is driven by the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio. Determination of the anidulafungin AUC along with MIC values can therefore be useful. Since obtaining a full concentration-time curve to determine an AUC is not always feasible or appropriate, limited-sampling strategies may be useful in adequately estimating exposure. The objective of this study was to develop a model to predict the individual anidulafungin exposure in critically ill patients using limited-sampling strategies. Pharmacokinetic data were derived from 20 critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis treated with anidulafungin. These data were used to develop a two-compartment model in MW\Pharm using an iterative 2-stage Bayesian procedure. Limited-sampling strategies were subsequently investigated using two methods, a Bayesian analysis and a linear regression analysis. The best possible strategies for these two methods were evaluated by a Bland-Altman analysis for correlation of the predicted and observed AUC from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) values. Anidulafungin exposure can be adequately estimated with the concentration from a single sample drawn 12 h after the start of the infusion either by linear regression (R2=0.99; bias, 0.05%; root mean square error [RMSE], 3%) or using a population pharmacokinetic model (R2=0.89; bias, -0.1%; RMSE, 9%) in critically ill patients and also in less severely ill patients, as reflected by healthy volunteers. Limited sampling can be advantageous for future studies evaluating the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anidulafungin and for therapeutic drug monitoring in selected patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01047267.).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnidulafunginBayes TheoremCandidiasis, InvasiveCritical IllnessEchinocandinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultAnidulafunginEchinocandins

Identifiers

PMID25487797
PMCPMC4335880
OpenAlexW2116476470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.