Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25487763›Full record

Trial reportDeutsches Arzteblatt international2014

Evaluating the efficacy of an education and treatment program for patients with coronary heart disease.

Richard J Melamed, Alexander Tillmann, Heidrun-Eva Kufleitner, Uwe Thürmer, Martin Dürsch

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Modifying Behaviors in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Article
  11. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Article
  12. Evaluation Does Exist.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard J MelamedTillmann have equally contributed to the article, Department of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Studiumdigitale-E-Learning Center, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Bürgerhospital, Frankfurt am Main, Praxis Thürmer/Endruleit, Frankfurt am Main, Cardiology Frankfurt-Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt am Main.
Alexander Tillmann
Heidrun-Eva Kufleitner
Uwe Thürmer
Martin Dürsch
Bürgerhospital Frankfurt am Main · DEKardiologie Frankfurt-Sachsenhausen · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUntil now, there has not been any evaluated, disease-specific education and treatment program for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in Germany. It is thought that education can improve these patients' physical activity and quality of life and teach them how to lessen their risk factors, what to do in case of an emergency, and how to assess their own medical treatment.

methodsA randomized controlled open intervention trial was carried out from February 2010 to September 2011. 196 patients were assigned to receive the intervention (patient education), while 199 were assigned to a control group. In an intention-to-treat analysis, baseline and follow-up data were compared after a mean interval of 220 days. The evaluative instruments included the Freiburg Questionnaire of Physical Activity, the MacNew Heart Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire, questionnaires regarding knowledge about CHD, ergometric performance ability, and the body-mass index.

resultsThe patients in the intervention group reported having increased their physical activity by a mean of 9.3 MET/week (MET=metabolic equivalent of task), compared to 2.5 MET/week in the control group; the difference of 6.8 MET/week was statistically significant (p = 0.015). The patients in the intervention group also rated their quality of life higher than those in the control group (0.2 ± 0.56 vs. 0.09 ± 0.53 [mean ± standard deviation], p = 0.056). They were significantly better informed than patients in the control group about risk factors and about what to do in an emergency.

conclusionPersistently unhealthy lifestyle is a common problem of CHD patients; the education and treatment program presented here may be a suitable means of improving patients' lifestyle for secondary prevention. Further studies will be needed to document long-term efficacy and to determine whether occasional refresher courses will be needed as well.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityRisk Reduction BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPrevalenceQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID25487763
PMCPMC4261555
OpenAlexW2098230181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.