Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25487573›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2015

Panspecies small-molecule disruptors of heterochromatin-mediated transcriptional gene silencing.

Emilie Castonguay, Sharon A White, Alexander Kagansky, Daniel J St-Cyr, Araceli G Castillo, Christiane Brugger, Rachel White, Carolina Bonilla, Michaela Spitzer, William C Earnshaw and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single cell analysis pushes the boundaries of TAD formation and function.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Emilie CastonguayWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sharon A WhiteWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alexander KaganskyMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Daniel J St-CyrInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Araceli G CastilloInstituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea La Mayora, Universidad de Málaga, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IHSM-UMA-CSIC), Area de Genética, Campus de Teatinos, Málaga, Spain.
Christiane BruggerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Science III, Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rachel WhiteWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Carolina BonillaDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Novum, Huddinge, Sweden.
Michaela SpitzerWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
William C EarnshawWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Thomas SchalchDepartment of Molecular Biology, Science III, Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Karl EkwallDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Novum, Huddinge, Sweden.
Mike TyersWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada md.tyers@umontreal.ca robin.allshire@ed.ac.uk.
Robin C AllshireWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom md.tyers@umontreal.ca robin.allshire@ed.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GBWellcome Centre for Cell Biology · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Geneva · CHInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer · CAUniversidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

CIHR MOP 119572European Research Council 233457Wellcome Trust 065061Wellcome Trust 073915Wellcome Trust 085178Wellcome Trust 092076Wellcome Trust 095021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterochromatin underpins gene repression, genome integrity, and chromosome segregation. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, conserved protein complexes effect heterochromatin formation via RNA interference-mediated recruitment of a histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferase to cognate chromatin regions. To identify small molecules that inhibit heterochromatin formation, we performed an in vivo screen for loss of silencing of a dominant selectable kanMX reporter gene embedded within fission yeast centromeric heterochromatin. Two structurally unrelated compounds, HMS-I1 and HMS-I2, alleviated kanMX silencing and decreased repressive H3K9 methylation levels at the transgene. The decrease in methylation caused by HMS-I1 and HMS-I2 was observed at all loci regulated by histone methylation, including centromeric repeats, telomeric regions, and the mating-type locus, consistent with inhibition of the histone deacetylases (HDACs) Clr3 and/or Sir2. Chemical-genetic epistasis and expression profiles revealed that both compounds affect the activity of the Clr3-containing Snf2/HDAC repressor complex (SHREC). In vitro HDAC assays revealed that HMS-I1 and HMS-I2 inhibit Clr3 HDAC activity. HMS-I1 also alleviated transgene reporter silencing by heterochromatin in Arabidopsis and a mouse cell line, suggesting a conserved mechanism of action. HMS-I1 and HMS-I2 bear no resemblance to known inhibitors of chromatin-based activities and thus represent novel chemical probes for heterochromatin formation and function.

Indexed as

AnimalsArabidopsisCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDioxanesDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, FungalGene SilencingHeterochromatinHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistone MethyltransferasesHistonesMicePiperazines2-(2,3-dihydrobenzo(b)(1,4)dioxin-6-yl)-6-methylimidazo(1,2-a)pyridineCell Cycle ProteinsClr3 protein, S pombeDioxanesHeterochromatinHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistone MethyltransferasesHistonesN-(benzo(b)thiophen-2-yl)-4-(2-chloro-6-fluorobenzyl)piperazine-1-carboxamidePiperazinesPyridinesSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteinssir2 protein, S pombeThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID25487573
PMCPMC4301722
OpenAlexW2168540377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.