Trial reportBMC research notes2014
Intermediate care in nursing home after hospital admission: a randomized controlled trial with one year follow-up.
Trial report in BMC research notes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of integrating primary healthcare in aftercare for older patients after discharge from tertiary hospitals-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2022Pooled it
- Interventions to Promote Early Discharge and Avoid Inappropriate Hospital (Re)Admission: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Pooled it
- Admission rates in a general practitioner-based versus a hospital specialist based, hospital-at-home model: ACCESS, an open-labelled randomised clinical trial of effectiveness.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018Trial
- Baseline risk factors associated with all-cause early hospitalization of older patients following admission to Danish municipal temporary stays.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Can facility-based transitional care improve patient flow? Lessons from four Canadian regions.Healthcare management forum · 2021Article
- Understanding transitional care programs for older adults who experience delayed discharge: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Identifying the Association Between Older Adults' Characteristics and Their Health-Related Outcomes in a Transition Care Setting: A Retrospective Audit.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- The effectiveness of intermediate care including transitional care interventions on function, healthcare utilisation and costs: a scoping review.European geriatric medicine · 2020Article
- Factors associated with success in transition care services among older people in Australia.BMC geriatrics · 2020Article
- Key Service Improvements After the Introduction of an Integrated Orthogeriatric Service.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Interorganizational Collaboration in Transitional Care - A Study of a Post-Discharge Programme for Elderly Patients.International journal of integrated care · 2016Article
- Three Different Outcomes in Older Community-dwelling Patients Receiving Intermediate Care in Nursing Home after Acute Hospitalization.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntermediate care is intended to reduce hospital admissions and facilitate early discharge. In Norway, a model was developed with transfer to intermediate care shortly after hospital admission. Efficacy and safety of this model have not been studied previously.In a parallel-group randomized controlled trial, patients over 70 years living at home before admission were eligible if clinically stable, without need for surgical treatment and deemed suited for intermediate care by attending physician. Intervention group patients were transferred to a nursing home unit with increased staff and multidisciplinary assessment, for a maximum stay of three weeks. Patients in the control group received usual care in hospital. Blinding to group assignment was not possible.The primary outcome was number of days living at home in a follow-up period of 365 days. Secondary outcomes were mortality, hospital admissions, need for residential care and home care services. Data were obtained from patient records and registers.
results376 patients were included, 74% female and mean age 84 years. There was no significant differences between intervention (n=190) and control group (n=186) for number of days living at home (253.7 vs 256.5, p=0.80) or days in hospital (10.4 vs 10.5, p=0.748). Intervention group patients spent less time in nursing home (40.6 days vs. 55.0, p=0.046), and more patients lived independently without home health care services (31.6% vs 19.9%, p=0.007). For orthopaedic patients (n=128), mortality was higher in the intervention group; 15 intervention patients and 7 controls died (25.1% vs 10.3%, p=0.049). There was no significant difference in one-year mortality for medical patients (n=150) or the total study population.
conclusionsThis model of rapid transfer to intermediate care did not significantly influence number of days living at home during one year follow-up, but reduced demand for nursing home care and need for home health care services. In post-hoc analysis mortality was increased for orthopedic patients.
trial registrationThe trial was registered 26. July 2013 at Current Controlled Trials and assigned with registration number ISRCTN21608185.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.