Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25487331›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Paging through history: parchment as a reservoir of ancient DNA for next generation sequencing.

M D Teasdale, N L van Doorn, S Fiddyment, C C Webb, T O'Connor, M Hofreiter, M J Collins, D G Bradley

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation StudyHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Paleoproteomics.Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Metagenomic analysis of a blood stain from the French revolutionary Jean-Paul Marat (1743-1793).Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

M D TeasdaleSmurfit Institute of Genetics, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
N L van DoornBioArCh, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
S FiddymentBioArCh, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
C C WebbBorthwick Institute for Archives, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
T O'ConnorBioArCh, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
M HofreiterBioArCh, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, Potsdam 14476, Germany.
M J CollinsBioArCh, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
D G BradleySmurfit Institute of Genetics, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland dbradley@tcd.ie.
University of York · GBTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parchment represents an invaluable cultural reservoir. Retrieving an additional layer of information from these abundant, dated livestock-skins via the use of ancient DNA (aDNA) sequencing has been mooted by a number of researchers. However, prior PCR-based work has indicated that this may be challenged by cross-individual and cross-species contamination, perhaps from the bulk parchment preparation process. Here we apply next generation sequencing to two parchments of seventeenth and eighteenth century northern English provenance. Following alignment to the published sheep, goat, cow and human genomes, it is clear that the only genome displaying substantial unique homology is sheep and this species identification is confirmed by collagen peptide mass spectrometry. Only 4% of sequence reads align preferentially to a different species indicating low contamination across species. Moreover, mitochondrial DNA sequences suggest an upper bound of contamination at 5%. Over 45% of reads aligned to the sheep genome, and even this limited sequencing exercise yield 9 and 7% of each sampled sheep genome post filtering, allowing the mapping of genetic affinity to modern British sheep breeds. We conclude that parchment represents an excellent substrate for genomic analyses of historical livestock.

Indexed as

FossilsAnimalsBase SequenceDNAEnglandHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, 18th CenturyLivestockMass SpectrometryMolecular Sequence DataSequence AlignmentSheepSkinSpecies SpecificityDNAancient DNAnext generation sequencingparchmentsheepZooMS

Identifiers

PMID25487331
PMCPMC4275887
OpenAlexW2019541580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.