Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25487307›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2015

The association of previously reported polymorphisms for microvascular complications in a meta-analysis of diabetic retinopathy.

S Mohsen Hosseini, Andrew P Boright, Lei Sun, Angelo J Canty, Shelley B Bull, Barbara E K Klein, Ronald Klein, DCCT/EDIC Research Group, Andrew D Paterson

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The ErythropoetinGenes · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

S Mohsen HosseiniGenetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Rm 12.9835, 686 Bay Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada, mohsen.hosseini@utoronto.ca.
Andrew P Boright
Lei Sun
Angelo J Canty
Shelley B Bull
Barbara E K Klein
Ronald Klein
DCCT/EDIC Research Group
Andrew D Paterson
Public Health Ontario · CASickKids Foundation · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Limited Competition for the Continuation of Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Clinical Research Center (Collaborative U01)U01DK094157 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Ionut Bebu, Barbara Halina Braffett · 2011 to 2026
$97.6M
Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Data Coordinating CenterU01DK094176 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BEBU, IONUT, BRAFFETT, BARBARA HALINA · 2012 to 2022
$30.8M
Epidemiology of Retinopathy and other Complications in Long Term Type 1 DiabetesR01EY016379 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KLEIN, BARBARA EDEN, KLEIN, RONALD · 2005 to 2016
$7.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016379NEI NIH HHS R01-EY016379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094157NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the association of signals from previous GWAS and candidate gene meta-analyses for diabetic retinopathy (DR) or nephropathy (DN), as well as an EPO variant in meta-analyses of severe (SDR) and mild diabetic retinopathy (MDR). Meta-analyses of SDR (≥severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or history of panretinal photocoagulation) and MDR (≥mild NPDR), defined based on seven-field stereoscopic fundus photographs, were performed in two well-characterized type 1 diabetes (T1D) cohorts: the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC, n = 1,304) and Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR, n = 603). Among 34 previous signals for DR, after controlling for multiple testing, no association was replicated in our meta-analyses. rs1571942 and rs12219125 at PLXDC2 locus showed nominally significant (<0.05) association with SDR in the same direction as previous report, as did rs1801282 in PPARG gene with MDR. Among 55 loci previously associated with DN, three showed suggestive associations with SDR in our study without maintaining significance after correction for multiple testing. Of particular interest, rs1617640 (EPO) was not significantly associated with DR status, combined SDR-DN phenotype, time to SDR or time to DN (all P > 0.05). Lack of replication of previous DR hits and EPO despite reasonable statistical power implies that many of these may be false positives. Consistent with pleiotropy, we provide suggestive collective evidence for association between DR and variants previously associated with DN without reaching statistical significance at any single locus.

Indexed as

Genetic LociPolymorphism, GeneticClinical Trials as TopicDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic RetinopathyErythropoietinFemaleHumansMaleReceptors, Cell SurfaceEPO protein, humanErythropoietinPLXDC2 protein, humanReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID25487307
PMCPMC4291513
OpenAlexW2061510396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.