Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25487237›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine & research2015

Survival Comparisons for Breast Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy Revisited: Community Experience and the Role of Radiation Therapy.

Adedayo A Onitilo, Jessica M Engel, Rachel V Stankowski, Suhail A R Doi

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine & research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Journal of biomedical optics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adedayo A OnitiloDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Marshfield Clinic-Weston Center, Weston, Wisconsin, USA School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia onitilo.adedayo@marshfieldclinic.org.
Jessica M EngelDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Marshfield Clinic Cancer Care, Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA.
Rachel V StankowskiMarshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Suhail A R DoiSchool of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Marshfield Clinic · USMarshfield Clinic Weston Center · USUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvidence suggests superiority of breast conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiation over mastectomy alone for treatment of early stage breast cancer. Whether the superiority of BCS plus radiation is related to the surgical approach itself or to the addition of adjuvant radiation therapy following BCS remains unclear. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with breast cancer diagnosed from 1994-2012. Data regarding patient and tumor characteristics and treatment specifics were captured electronically. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed with inverse probability of treatment weighting to reduce selection bias effects in surgical assignment.

resultsData from 5335 women were included, of which two-thirds had BCS and one-third had mastectomy. Surgical decision trends changed over time with more women undergoing mastectomy in recent years. Women who underwent BCS versus mastectomy differed significantly regarding age, cancer stage/grade, adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy, and endocrine treatment. Overall survival was similar for BCS and mastectomy. When BCS plus radiation was compared to mastectomy alone, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival was 96.5% vs 93.4%, 92.9% vs 88.3% and 80.9% vs 67.2%, respectively.

conclusionThese analyses suggest that survival benefit is not related only to the surgery itself, but that the prognostic advantage of BCS plus radiation over mastectomy may also be related to the addition of adjuvant radiation therapy. This conclusion requires prospective confirmation in randomized trials.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, RadicalMastectomy, SegmentalAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeBreast conservationBreast neoplasms/radiotherapyBreast neoplasms/surgeryMastectomy/statisticsRisk factorsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID25487237
PMCPMC4504664
OpenAlexW2152156802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.