Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25487132›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2016

Differences in the use of involuntary admission across the Veneto Region: which role for individual and contextual variables?

V Donisi, F Tedeschi, D Salazzari, F Amaddeo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predicting involuntary hospitalization in psychiatry: A machine learning investigation.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021
    Article
  8. Factors associated with involuntary psychiatric hospitalization in Portugal.International journal of mental health systems · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V DonisiSection of Psychiatry,Department of Public Health and Community Medicine,University of Verona,37134 Verona,Italy.
F TedeschiSection of Psychiatry,Department of Public Health and Community Medicine,University of Verona,37134 Verona,Italy.
D SalazzariSection of Psychiatry,Department of Public Health and Community Medicine,University of Verona,37134 Verona,Italy.
F AmaddeoSection of Psychiatry,Department of Public Health and Community Medicine,University of Verona,37134 Verona,Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe first aim of this study is to compare involuntary admissions across the Veneto Region in Italy. The second aim is to explore the relation between mental health services provision, characteristics of population, individual factors and involuntary admissions.

methodsFor 21 Mental Health Departments (MHDs) in the Veneto Region (Italy), the average population prevalence rate of involuntary admissions between 2000 and 2007 and the percentage of involuntary admissions were calculated. Chi-square tests for equality of proportions were used to test hypotheses. Variables at the individual, contextual and organisational levels were used in multiple regressions, with the involuntary admission data as dependent variables.

resultsThe average prevalence rate of involuntary commitment was 12.75 ranging from 1.96 to 27.59 across MHDs . About 75% of the involuntary admissions referred to psychotic patients, and almost half of patients were aged 25-44. Significant differences among MHDs emerged; higher percentages of involuntary admissions were generally found in densely populated areas. Higher ageing indices and rates of social workers were found as predictors of the prevalence rate. In the multilevel regression, being males and psychotic significantly increased involuntary admissions, while the percentage of singles in population decreased it.

conclusionsThis study contributes to define the specific contribution of each factor predicting the use of involuntary admission, even within areas under the same legislation. It shows how the inclusion of both individual and contextual factors may lead to better predictions and provides precious data for the services improvement.

Indexed as

Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric DisordersAdultFemaleHumansItalyMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPrevalenceCompulsory admissioninvoluntary admissionmultilevel logistic regressionpsychiatric hospital discharge

Identifiers

PMID25487132
PMCPMC6998663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.