ReviewClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2014
Progress in novel cellular therapy options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the M D Anderson perspective.
Review in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Craniospinal irradiation prior to stem cell transplant for hematologic malignancies with CNS involvement: Effectiveness and toxicity after photon or proton treatment.Practical radiation oncologyTrial
- Matrine increases NKG2D ligand ULBP2 in K562 cells via inhibiting JAK/STAT3 pathway: a potential mechanism underlying the immunotherapy of matrine in leukemia.American journal of translational research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past several years there has been considerable progress in the number and breadth of therapeutic options for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In particular, cumulative experience with stem cell transplant and immunotherapy has made these modalities more available to a broader range of patients. Advances in genetic engineering and ex vivo expansion techniques have sculpted cellular therapy products to optimize the combination of specificity and toxicity. This brief review discusses recent cutting-edge experience with chimeric antigen receptor T cells as well as developing cellular therapy products at the authors' institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.