Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25486560›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2014

Tus-Ter as a tool to study site-specific DNA replication perturbation in eukaryotes.

Nicolai B Larsen, Ian D Hickson, Hocine W Mankouri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Stalled replication forks generate a distinct mutational signature in yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolai B Larsena Center for Healthy Aging; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine ; University of Copenhagen ; Copenhagen , Denmark.
Ian D Hickson
Hocine W Mankouri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high-affinity binding of the Tus protein to specific 21-bp sequences, called Ter, causes site-specific, and polar, DNA replication fork arrest in E coli. The Tus-Ter complex serves to coordinate DNA replication with chromosome segregation in this organism. A number of recent and ongoing studies have demonstrated that Tus-Ter can be used as a heterologous tool to generate site-specific perturbation of DNA replication when reconstituted in eukaryotes. Here, we review these recent findings and explore the molecular mechanism by which Tus-Ter mediates replication fork (RF) arrest in the budding yeast, S. cerevisiae. We propose that Tus-Ter is a versatile, genetically tractable, and regulatable RF blocking system that can be utilized for disrupting DNA replication in a diverse range of host cells.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsRecombinational DNA RepairSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesDNA replication terminus site-binding protein, E coliEscherichia coli Proteinstus protein, E coliDnaB helicasehomologous recombination repairMCM helicaseRecQ helicasereplication fork

Identifiers

PMID25486560
PMCPMC4614373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.