Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25486515›Full record

ArticleeLife2014

Ambiguities in helical reconstruction.

Edward H Egelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. GSK3β phosphorylated tau filaments are probably not like those from AD brains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Helical reconstruction, again.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Helical Indexing in Real Space.Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial Intracellular Filaments.Cell reports. Physical science · 2020
    Article
  19. Atomic structure of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Amyloid structure determination in RELION-3.1.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Edward H EgelmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States.

Funding

Methods for the Analysis of Helical Macromolecular ComplexesR01EB001567 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI EGELMAN, EDWARD H. · 2003 to 2014
$3.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB001567NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helical polymers are found throughout biology and account for a substantial fraction of the protein in a cell. These filaments are very attractive for three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs due to the fact that projections of these filaments show many different views of identical subunits in identical environments. However, ambiguities exist in defining the symmetry of a helical filament when one has limited resolution, and mistakes can be made. Until one reaches a near-atomic level of resolution, there are not necessarily reality-checks that can distinguish between correct and incorrect solutions. A recent paper in eLife (Xu et al., 2014) almost certainly imposed an incorrect helical symmetry and this can be seen using filament images posted by Xu et al. A comparison between the atomic model proposed and the published three-dimensional reconstruction should have suggested that an incorrect solution was found.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCryoelectron MicroscopyImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, MolecularProtein Structure, SecondaryAdaptor Proteins, Signal Transducingbiophysicscryo-EMhelical symmetryhumanstructural biologythree-dimensional reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID25486515
PMCPMC4371874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.