Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25486403›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2015

Adoption of injectable naltrexone in U.S. substance use disorder treatment programs.

Lydia Aletraris, Mary Bond Edmond, Paul M Roman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Developmental Considerations for the Use of Naltrexone in Children and Adolescents.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lydia AletrarisOwens Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Mary Bond EdmondOwens Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Paul M RomanOwens Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
University of Georgia · US

Funding

Adoption of Innovations in Private A & D Treatment CentersR37DA013110 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI ROMAN, PAUL M · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
Use of Evidence-based Practices in Alcoholism TreatmentR01AA015974 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI ROMAN, PAUL M · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015974NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA015974NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA013110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMedication-assisted treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs) is not widely used in treatment programs. The aims of the current study were to document the prevalence of adoption and implementation of extended-release injectable naltrexone, the newest U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medication for alcohol use disorder (AUD), in U.S. treatment programs and to examine associations between organizational and patient characteristics and adoption.

methodThe study used interview data from a nationally representative sample of 307 U.S. SUD treatment programs to examine adoption and implementation of injectable naltrexone.

resultsThirteen percent of programs used injectable naltrexone for AUD, and 3% of programs used it for opioid use disorder. Every treatment program that offered injectable naltrexone to its patients used it in conjunction with psychosocial treatment, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy. Multivariate logistic regression results indicated that adoption was positively associated with the provision of wraparound services, the percentage of privately insured patients, and the presence of inpatient detoxification services. For-profit status and offering inpatient services were negatively associated with adoption. Within adopting programs, an average of 4.1% of AUD patients and 7.1% of patients with opioid use disorder were currently receiving the medication, despite clinical directors' reports of positive patient outcomes, particularly for relapsers and for those who had been noncompliant with other medications. Cost was a significant issue for the majority of adopting organizations.

conclusionsThe rate of adoption of injectable naltrexone in U.S. treatment programs remains limited. Researchers should continue to examine patient, organizational, and external characteristics associated with the adoption and implementation of injectable naltrexone over time.

Indexed as

Alcohol-Related DisordersHumansNaltrexoneOpioid-Related DisordersSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersUnited StatesNaltrexone

Identifiers

PMID25486403
PMCPMC4263776
OpenAlexW2052813313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.