Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25486286›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of perinatology2015

Necrotizing enterocolitis in infants with ductal-dependent congenital heart disease.

Kristian C Becker, Christoph P Hornik, C Michael Cotten, Reese H Clark, Kevin D Hill, P Brian Smith, Robert W Lenfestey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of perinatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03142685 (Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Necrotizing Enterocolitis Screening Using Abdominal Radiograph Versus Bowel Ultrasound Plus Abdominal Radiograph in Congenital Heart Disease Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03142685 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Necrotizing Enterocolitis Screening Using Abdominal Radiograph Versus Bowel Ultrasound Plus Abdominal Radiograph in Congenital Heart Disease Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled0ConditionsEnterocolitis, Necrotizing, Congenital Heart DiseaseArmsBowel Ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Feeding Approach to Optimizing Nutrition in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristian C BeckerDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Christoph P HornikDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
C Michael CottenDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Reese H ClarkMedical Group, Pediatrix-Obstetrix Center for Research and Education, Sunrise, Florida.
Kevin D HillDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
P Brian SmithDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Robert W LenfesteyDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Medical Center · USClinical Research Institute · USDurham University · GB

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001117NICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200700051CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000003CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000003INIDDK NIH HHS HHSN267200700051C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInfants with congenital heart disease (CHD) receiving prostaglandins (PGEs) may be at an increased risk for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Enteral feeding may further increase the risk of NEC in these patients. We evaluated the incidence of NEC and its association with enteral feeding in infants with ductal-dependent CHD. STUDY

designWe examined a cohort of infants with CHD receiving PGE in neonatal intensive care units managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group (Sunrise, FL) between 1997 and 2010. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association between NEC and enteral feeding, as well as other risk factors, including antacid medications, inotropic and ventilator support, and anatomic characteristics, controlling for gestational age.

resultsWe identified 6,710 infants with ductal-dependent CHD receiving PGE for 17,158 infant days. NEC occurred in 21 of the 6,710 (0.3%) infants, of whom 12/21 (57%) were < 37 weeks gestational age. The incidence of NEC was 1.2/1,000 infant days while on enteral feeds versus 0.4/1,000 infant days while not on enteral feeds (p = 0.27). Enteral feeding was not associated with a statistically significant increased odds of NEC on the day of diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38, 11.7). Risk factors associated with a significant increased odds of NEC included a diagnosis of single-ventricle heart defect (OR 2.82; 95% CI 1.23, 6.49), although the overall risk in this population remained low (8/1,631, 0.5%).

conclusionThe incidence of NEC in our cohort of infants with ductal-dependent CHD on PGE therapy was low and did not increase with enteral feeding.

Indexed as

Birth WeightEnteral NutritionEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFemaleGestational AgeHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMalePremature BirthProstaglandinsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsProstaglandins

Identifiers

PMID25486286
PMCPMC4449801
OpenAlexW2086750804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.