Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25485970›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The molecular signature of the stroma response in prostate cancer-induced osteoblastic bone metastasis highlights expansion of hematopoietic and prostate epithelial stem cell niches.

Berna C Özdemir, Janine Hensel, Chiara Secondini, Antoinette Wetterwald, Ruth Schwaninger, Achim Fleischmann, Wolfgang Raffelsberger, Olivier Poch, Mauro Delorenzi, Ramzi Temanni and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Immune mediated support of metastasis: Implication for bone invasion.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Role of prostate and bone stromal cells on prostate cancer progression.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Berna C ÖzdemirUrology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Janine HenselUrology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Chiara SecondiniUrology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Antoinette WetterwaldUrology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ruth SchwaningerUrology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Achim FleischmannInstitute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Wolfgang RaffelsbergerInstitut Génétique Biologie Moléculaire Cellulaire (IGBMC), Strasbourg, France.
Olivier PochICube UMR7357, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Mauro DelorenziLudwig Center for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Lausanne and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ramzi TemanniBiomedical Informatics Division, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
Ian G MillsProstate Cancer Research Group, Norway Centre for Molecular Medicine (NCMM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Gabri van der PluijmDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
George N ThalmannUrology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marco G CecchiniUrology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHInstitut de génétique et de biologie moléculaire et cellulaire · FRLeiden University Medical Center · NLSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHSidra Medical and Research Center · QAUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reciprocal interaction between cancer cells and the tissue-specific stroma is critical for primary and metastatic tumor growth progression. Prostate cancer cells colonize preferentially bone (osteotropism), where they alter the physiological balance between osteoblast-mediated bone formation and osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, and elicit prevalently an osteoblastic response (osteoinduction). The molecular cues provided by osteoblasts for the survival and growth of bone metastatic prostate cancer cells are largely unknown. We exploited the sufficient divergence between human and mouse RNA sequences together with redefinition of highly species-specific gene arrays by computer-aided and experimental exclusion of cross-hybridizing oligonucleotide probes. This strategy allowed the dissection of the stroma (mouse) from the cancer cell (human) transcriptome in bone metastasis xenograft models of human osteoinductive prostate cancer cells (VCaP and C4-2B). As a result, we generated the osteoblastic bone metastasis-associated stroma transcriptome (OB-BMST). Subtraction of genes shared by inflammation, wound healing and desmoplastic responses, and by the tissue type-independent stroma responses to a variety of non-osteotropic and osteotropic primary cancers generated a curated gene signature ("Core" OB-BMST) putatively representing the bone marrow/bone-specific stroma response to prostate cancer-induced, osteoblastic bone metastasis. The expression pattern of three representative Core OB-BMST genes (PTN, EPHA3 and FSCN1) seems to confirm the bone specificity of this response. A robust induction of genes involved in osteogenesis and angiogenesis dominates both the OB-BMST and Core OB-BMST. This translates in an amplification of hematopoietic and, remarkably, prostate epithelial stem cell niche components that may function as a self-reinforcing bone metastatic niche providing a growth support specific for osteoinductive prostate cancer cells. The induction of this combinatorial stem cell niche is a novel mechanism that may also explain cancer cell osteotropism and local interference with hematopoiesis (myelophthisis). Accordingly, these stem cell niche components may represent innovative therapeutic targets and/or serum biomarkers in osteoblastic bone metastasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBone NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationEpithelial CellsGene Expression ProfilingHematopoietic SystemHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleMiceNeovascularization, PathologicOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOsteoblastsOsteogenesisProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25485970
PMCPMC4259356
OpenAlexW1989341512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.