ArticlePloS one2014
Understanding and using the brief Implicit Association Test: recommended scoring procedures.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Low and variable correlation between reaction time costs and accuracy costs explained by accumulation models: Meta-analysis and simulations.Psychological bulletin · 2018Pooled it
- Acute lorazepam administration does not significantly affect moral attitudes or judgments.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Examining the malleability of implicit views of aging in middle-aged and older adults.Psychology and aging · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Understanding how adherence goals promote adherence behaviours: a repeated measure observational study with HIV seropositive patients.BMC public health · 2012Trial
- Psychological distress, racism, sexism, cissexism, heterosexism, ageism, and sizeism: analyzing patterns of association using explicit and implicit measures of discrimination.AJE advances : research in epidemiology · 2026Article
- Anxiety Symptom Severity and Implicit and Explicit Self-As-Anxious Associations in a Large Online Sample of U.S. Adults: Trends From 2011 to 2022.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025Article
- Advancing equity in healthcare systems: understanding implicit bias and infant mortality.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Past suicide attempt is associated with a weaker decision-making bias to actively escape from suicide-related stimuli.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2025Article
- Are You a Closet Dualist? Evidence From Brief Implicit Association Task.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Implicit Stigma Toward People with Mental Illness Among Different Groups: Measurement, Extent, and Correlates.Psychology research and behavior management · 2025Review
- Article
- How pre-processing decisions affect the reliability and validity of the approach-avoidance task: Evidence from simulations and multiverse analyses with six datasets.Behavior research methods · 2024Review
- Affective associations towards running: fuzzy patterns of implicit-explicit interaction in young female runners and non-runners.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- The role of objectification in young men's perpetration of intimate partner violence.PloS one · 2024Article
- Uncovering the potential of evaluative conditioning in shaping attitudes toward sustainable product packaging.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Implicit and explicit COVID-19 associations and mental health in the United States: a large-scale examination and replication.Anxiety, stress, and coping · 2023Article
- Misplaced Intuitions in Interventions to Reduce Attractiveness-Based Discrimination.Personality & social psychology bulletin · 2023Article
- COVID-Dynamic: A large-scale longitudinal study of socioemotional and behavioral change across the pandemic.Scientific data · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A brief version of the Implicit Association Test (BIAT) has been introduced. The present research identified analytical best practices for overall psychometric performance of the BIAT. In 7 studies and multiple replications, we investigated analytic practices with several evaluation criteria: sensitivity to detecting known effects and group differences, internal consistency, relations with implicit measures of the same topic, relations with explicit measures of the same topic and other criterion variables, and resistance to an extraneous influence of average response time. The data transformation algorithms D outperformed other approaches. This replicates and extends the strong prior performance of D compared to conventional analytic techniques. We conclude with recommended analytic practices for standard use of the BIAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.