Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25485755›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2015

Synaptic and circuit mechanisms promoting broadband transmission of olfactory stimulus dynamics.

Katherine I Nagel, Elizabeth J Hong, Rachel I Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Normative and mechanistic model of an adaptive circuit for efficient encoding and feature extraction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine I NagelDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Elizabeth J HongDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachel I WilsonDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Synaptic and Circuit Mechanisms of Olfactory ProcessingR01DC008174 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WILSON, RACHEL · 2006 to 2021
$5.5M
Olfactory navigation in Drosophila as a model for multi-sensory integrationR00DC012065 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI NAGEL, KATHERINE · 2014 to 2016
$745k
Olfactory navigation in Drosophila as a model for multi-sensory integrationK99DC012065 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NAGEL, KATHERINE · 2012 to 2013
$177k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC012065NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC012065NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory stimuli fluctuate on many timescales. However, short-term plasticity causes synapses to act as temporal filters, limiting the range of frequencies that they can transmit. How synapses in vivo might transmit a range of frequencies in spite of short-term plasticity is poorly understood. The first synapse in the Drosophila olfactory system exhibits short-term depression, but can transmit broadband signals. Here we describe two mechanisms that broaden the frequency characteristics of this synapse. First, two distinct excitatory postsynaptic currents transmit signals on different timescales. Second, presynaptic inhibition dynamically updates synaptic properties to promote accurate transmission of signals across a wide range of frequencies. Inhibition is transient, but grows slowly, and simulations reveal that these two features of inhibition promote broadband synaptic transmission. Dynamic inhibition is often thought to restrict the temporal patterns that a neuron responds to, but our results illustrate a different idea: inhibition can expand the bandwidth of neural coding.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsAxonsDrosophilaElectric StimulationExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsNeural PathwaysOptogeneticsPatch-Clamp TechniquesSmellStimulation, ChemicalSynapses

Identifiers

PMID25485755
PMCPMC4289142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.