Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25485519›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2015

Gamma oscillations in the midbrain spatial attention network: linking circuits to function.

Devarajan Sridharan, Eric I Knudsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Morphology and Dendrite-Specific Synaptic Properties of Midbrain Neurons Shape Multimodal Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Entrainment within neuronal response in optic tectum of pigeon to video displays.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Devarajan SridharanDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States. Electronic address: dsridhar@stanford.edu.
Eric I KnudsenDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Cholinergic control of spatial attention: cellular and circuit mechanismsR01EY024243 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KNUDSEN, ERIC · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS EY024243NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamma-band (25-140Hz) oscillations are ubiquitous in mammalian forebrain structures involved in sensory processing, attention, learning and memory. The optic tectum (OT) is the central structure in a midbrain network that participates critically in controlling spatial attention. In this review, we summarize recent advances in characterizing a neural circuit in this midbrain network that generates large amplitude, space-specific, gamma oscillations in the avian OT, both in vivo and in vitro. We describe key physiological and pharmacological mechanisms that produce and regulate the structure of these oscillations. The extensive similarities between midbrain gamma oscillations in birds and those in the neocortex and hippocampus of mammals, offer important insights into the functional significance of a midbrain gamma oscillatory code.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionBiological ClocksGamma RhythmHumansMesencephalonNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID25485519
PMCPMC4934386
OpenAlexW2057902688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.