ArticleJournal of neurological surgery reports2014
Conservative Healing of an 11 × 9-cm Aplasia Cutis Congenita of the Scalp with Bone Defect.
Article in Journal of neurological surgery reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Case Report of Postoperative Cystic Hydrocephalus Following Duroplasty and Scalp Reconstruction in Neonatal With Aplasia Cutis Congenita and Extensive Craniodural Defect.Case reports in surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical management of aplasia cutis congenita of the scalp and skull defect in a resource-limited setting: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Adams-Oliver Syndrome: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Clinical, Nutritional, Genetic, and Molecular Aspects with Nursing Care Considerations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Healing by secondary intention over NeoDura applicated on a craniectomy defect: a case report and literature review.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Review
- Aplasia cutis congenita: Two case reports and discussion of the literature.Surgical neurology international · 2017Article
- Failed conservative management of a case of aplasia cutis congenita in a low-income country.Clinical case reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Aplasia cutis congenita is a rare congenital condition, and it is difficult to find scientific support for optimal treatment strategies. In addition, these may vary due to defect size, tissue layers involved, contemporary malformations, and the physiologic status of the affected child. Clinical Presentation This case report describes complete skin coverage in 20 weeks and uneventful healing of a large 11 × 9-cm defect of the vertex, involving both skin and skull bone, using conservative treatment. To prevent infection and promote healing, the defect was kept moist and covered at all times, and it was treated with surgical debridement when necessary. For infection control, ionized silver-coated dressings were used in addition to prophylactic antibiotics over the first 3.5 weeks. Follow-up was 2 years. Conclusion Surgical treatment is usually preferred for larger aplasia cutis congenita defects, but it is accompanied with potential risks and will exacerbate secondary reconstruction of alopecia or skull bone defects. This case shows that even very complex defects may be treated conservatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.