Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25484451›Full record

ArticleJournal of marriage and the family2014

Husbands' Participation in Housework and Child Care in India.

Nancy Luke, Hongwei Xu, Binitha V Thampi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of marriage and the family, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nancy LukeDepartment of Sociology and Criminology, The Pennsylvania State University, 906 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802 ( nkl10@psu.edu ).
Hongwei XuSurvey Research Center, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St., 216 NU ISR Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
Binitha V ThampiDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Room No. HSB 331, Chennai 600 036, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

Female Income and Family Welfare in IndiaR01HD046940 · NICHD · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI MUNSHI, KAIVAN · 2005 to 2007
$922k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors tested theories of housework among tea plantation workers in India, where women comprise the main part of the workforce and are breadwinners in their families. Analysis of 49 semistructured interviews and survey data from 3,181 female workers revealed that although women were mainly responsible for domestic labor, more than half of husbands usually or sometimes helped their wives with cooking, fuel wood collection, and child care. The analyses revealed a curvilinear relationship between husbands' earnings share and their participation in each task, supporting theories of bargaining and gender display. The probability of male participation decreased to its lowest level when men earned less than their wives. Husbands rarely helped with clothes washing-considered the most feminine task-and their participation did not respond to changes in relative earnings. These results support the authors' argument that patterns of bargaining and gender display will vary depending on the gendered nature of housework tasks within a particular society.

Indexed as

families and workgenderhousework/division of labornon-U.S. families

Identifiers

PMID25484451
PMCPMC4256024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.