Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25484359›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2015

Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.

Karen Ackroff, Anthony Sclafani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karen AckroffDepartment of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA. Electronic address: kackroff@gc.cuny.edu.
Anthony SclafaniDepartment of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Funding

Carbohydrate Appetite, Fat Appetite and ObesityR37DK031135 · NIDDK · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI SCLAFANI, ANTHONY · 2001 to 2010
$2.9M
CARBOHYDRATE APPETITE, FAT APPETITE, AND OBESITYR01DK031135 · NIDDK · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI ACKROFF, KAREN, SCLAFANI, ANTHONY · 1986 to 2015
$2.0M
Discovery of Natural Products and Natural Product-Like InhibitorsZ01DK031135 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI BEWLEY, CAROLE · 2007 to 2008
$844k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK031135NIDDK NIH HHS DK-31135NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK031135NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK031135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When mice trained to consume a CS- flavored solution paired with intragastric (IG) water self-infusion are given a new CS+ flavor paired with IG glucose self-infusion, their intake is stimulated within minutes in the first CS+ test. They also display a preference for the CS+ over the CS- in two-bottle tests. These indicators of post-oral appetite stimulation (appetition) have been studied in food-restricted mice, with novel CS+ and CS- flavors. Two experiments tested whether deprivation and flavor novelty are needed for stimulation of intake. Exp. 1 compared food-restricted and ad libitum fed C57BL/6 mice trained for 1h/day: 3 sessions with CS- flavor and IG water followed by 3 sessions with a novel CS+ flavor and IG 16% glucose. Ad libitum (AL) fed mice licked less overall, but like the food-restricted (FR) group they increased licking in the first session. In the choice test, FR mice displayed a significant CS+ preference (73%) whereas AL mice had a weaker preference (64%). In Exp. 2, food-restricted mice were trained with a flavor and IG water, and then the Same or a New flavor paired with IG 8% glucose. The glucose infusion rapidly stimulated intakes in the first and subsequent sessions and to the same degree in the two groups. Both groups also showed similar reductions in licking in extinction tests with IG water infusions. These data show that mice need not be explicitly food deprived or given a novel flavor cue to increase ongoing ingestion in response to post-oral glucose stimulation.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAppetite RegulationConditioning, PsychologicalDrinking BehaviorFlavoring AgentsFood DeprivationFood PreferencesGlucoseMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReinforcement ScheduleSelf AdministrationSweetening AgentsFlavoring AgentsGlucoseSweetening AgentsAppetitionGlucoseIntragastricPost-oral nutrient conditioning

Identifiers

PMID25484359
PMCPMC4298460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.