ArticleBMC medicine2014
Better management of multimorbidity: a critical look at the 'Ariadne principles'.
Article in BMC medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital telemedicine interventions for patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Multimorbidity and consultation time: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2020Pooled it
- Does integrated care reduce hospital activity for patients with chronic diseases? An umbrella review of systematic reviews.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Effectiveness of an intervention for improving drug prescription in primary care patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: study protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial (Multi-PAP project).Implementation science : IS · 2017Trial
- Integrated Care as a Model for Interprofessional Disease Management and the Benefits for People Living with HIV/AIDS.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- How to Improve Healthcare for Patients with Multimorbidity and Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial of the MULTIPAP Intervention.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Patient-reported safety incidents in older patients with long-term conditions: a large cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2017Article
- [Multimorbidity in general practice and the Ariadne principles. A person-centred approach].Atencion primaria · 2017Article
- Understanding the physical, social, and emotional experiences of people with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
- What are the core predictors of 'hassles' among patients with multimorbidity in primary care? A cross sectional study.BMC health services research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary care clinicians and researchers are growing increasingly aware of the prevalence of multimorbidity among long-term conditions, and the impact on patient experience, health, and utilisation of care. The correspondence paper by Muth et al. entitled 'The Ariadne principles: how to handle multimorbidity in primary care consultations' outlines new thinking on a better way to manage the challenges of decision-making in multimorbidity. The paper highlights the importance of shared treatment goals as a fundamental basis for more effective management. Although a welcome contribution to the literature, the principles raise a number of challenges: the complexities of achieving effective patient-centred assessment and goal-setting; how best to encourage implementation of new practices; and the current state of the evidence around multimorbidity and its management.Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/223.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.