ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2014
Performance of partial cystectomy in the United States from 2001 to 2010: trends and comparative outcomes.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer-Specific Mortality of Partial Cystectomy Versus Radical Cystectomy in T2N0M0 Urothelial Bladder Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of Surgical Technique on Surgical Margin Status Following Partial Cystectomy.Urologic oncology · 2019Article
- Contemporary rates of adherence to international guidelines for pelvic lymph node dissection in radical cystectomy: a population-based study.World journal of urology · 2018Article
- Radical cystectomy for recurrent urothelial carcinoma after prior partial cystectomy: perioperative and oncologic outcomes.World journal of urology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo investigate the trends in the performance of radical cystectomy (RC) versus partial cystectomy (PC) in the United States over the past 10 years and compare postoperative outcomes between two procedures. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe data was captured from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2001-2010 using the appropriate ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes. Patient sociodemographics, comorbidities and in-hospital complications after PC and RC were compared, taking into account some hospital characteristics. A chi-square analysis including a Cochran-Armitage trend test and a multivariable logistic regression analysis were employed.
resultsRC rate increased from 84.8% in 2001 to 90.3% in 2010, while PC decreased from 15.2% to 9.7% (p < 0.0001). PC patients were older than their RC counterparts (72.1 ± 11.3 versus 68.6 ± 10.1 years; p < 0.0001), had higher prevalence of major comorbidities, but decreased rate of postoperative complications overall (21.3% versus 38.6%; p < 0.001). The greatest rates of PC utilization were found in the Northeast and South (12.8% and 12.7%). The frequency of PC was 18.9% in non-teaching hospitals compared to 9.0% in teaching hospitals (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, females, octogenarians, patients with hypertension and obesity, and patients in non-teaching and rural hospitals were more likely to receive PC.
conclusionsDespite the potential advantages in cancer control offered by RC, PC is being performed more frequently on the elderly, female patients, patients with hypertension and obesity, in non-teaching and rural hospitals, and in certain United States geographic regions, which can be partially explained by disparities in access to high volume cancer centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25483757PMC4297651W2262497926What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.