Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25483747›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2015

CCL2 Chemokine as a Potential Biomarker for Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Igor Tsaur, Anika Noack, Jasmina Makarevic, Elsie Oppermann, Ana Maria Waaga-Gasser, Martin Gasser, Hendrik Borgmann, Tanja Huesch, Kilian M Gust, Michael Reiter and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Igor TsaurDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Anika NoackDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jasmina MakarevicDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Elsie OppermannDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ana Maria Waaga-GasserDepartment of Surgery I, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Julius-Maximilians-University, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Martin GasserDepartment of Surgery I, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Julius-Maximilians-University, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Hendrik BorgmannDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Tanja HueschDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Kilian M GustDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Michael ReiterDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
David SchillingDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Georg BartschDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Axel HaferkampDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Roman A BlahetaDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
University Hospital Frankfurt · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstate specific antigen is not reliable in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa), making the identification of novel, precise diagnostic biomarkers important. Since chemokines are associated with more aggressive disease and poor prognosis in diverse malignancies, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic relevance of chemokines in PCa. MATERIALS AND

methodsPreoperative and early postoperative serum samples were obtained from 39 consecutive PCa patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Serum from 15 healthy volunteers served as controls. Concentrations of CXCL12, CXCL13, CX3CL1, CCL2, CCL5, and CCL20 were measured in serum by Luminex. The expression activity of CXCR3, CXCR4, CXCR5, CXCR7, CXCL12, CXCL13, CX3CR1, CXCL1, CCR2, CCR5, CCR6, CCR7, CCL2, and CCL5 mRNA was assessed in tumor and adjacent normal tissue of prostatectomy specimens by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The associations of these chemokines with clinical and histological parameters were tested.

resultsThe gene expression activity of CCL2 and CCR6 was significantly higher in tumor tissue compared to adjacent normal tissue. CCL2 was also significantly higher in the blood samples of PCa patients, compared to controls. CCL5, CCL20, and CX3CL1 were lower in patient serum, compared to controls. CCR2 tissue mRNA was negatively correlated with the Gleason score and grading.

conclusionChemokines are significantly modified during tumorigenesis of PCa, and CCL2 is a promising diagnostic biomarker.

Indexed as

Biological markersChemokine CCL2ChemokinesDiagnosisProstatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25483747
PMCPMC4398105
OpenAlexW1995181448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.