ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014
Comparison of virulence between the Yersinia pestis Microtus 201, an avirulent strain to humans, and the vaccine strain EV in rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Live Plague Vaccine Development: Past, Present, and Future.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Complete Protection AgainstFrontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Plague vaccines: new developments in an ongoing search.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Animal Models of Type III Secretion System-Mediated Pathogenesis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our previous study has demonstrated that Yersinia pestis Microtus 201 is a low virulent strain to the Chinese-origin rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta, and can protect it against high dose of virulent Y. pestis challenge by subcutaneous route. To investigate whether the Y. pestis Microtus 201 can be used as a live attenuated vaccine candidate, in this study its intravenous virulence was determined and compared with the live attenuated vaccine strain EV in the Chinese-origin rhesus macaque model. The results showed that the Chinese-origin rhesus macaques can survive intravenous infection with approximately 10(9) CFU of the Y. pestis Microtus 201, but all the animals succumbed to 10(10) CFU of intravenous infection. By contrast, all the animals survive intravenous infection with 10(10) CFU of the vaccine EV. Post-mortem examination showed multiple areas of severe abscess in the lungs of the dead animals infected with 10(10) CFU of the Y. pestis Microtus 201, whereas histopathology observation, microbiological examination and immunohistochemistry staining showed that the Y. pestis Microtus 201 also invaded hearts, livers, spleens, kidneys and lymph nodes and caused different degrees of pathological changes in these organs. These results indicated that the Y. pestis Microtus 201 is indeed low virulent to monkeys, but it is more virulent than the vaccine EV when administered by intravenous route. The Y. pestis Microtus 201 mainly attack the lungs when administered by intravenous infection, which may be the leading cause of animal death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.