Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25483680›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Current opinion and review on peanut oral immunotherapy.

Sharon Deol, J Andrew Bird

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microneedles coated with peanut allergen enable desensitization of peanut sensitized mice.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon Deola Division of Allergy & Immunology; Department of Internal Medicine ; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center ; Dallas , TX USA.
J Andrew Bird
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, peanut oral immunotherapy research has shown promise as an alternative treatment to avoidance in peanut-allergic patients. Research has not only focused on desensitization, but also on immunologic changes and sustained-tolerance. This article reviews the current literature and the historical background of oral immunotherapy as well as immune mechanisms in oral immunotherapy and other therapies being explored in food allergic individuals.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAllergensArachisDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansImmune TolerancePeanut HypersensitivityAllergensDC, dendritic cellsdesensitizationFAHF-2, food allergy herbal formula-2food allergyiTreg, induced Treg cellsOFC, oral food challengeOIT, oral immunotherapyoral immunotherapypeanutSCIT, subcutaneous immunotherapyTCM, traditional Chinese medicinetreatment

Identifiers

PMID25483680
PMCPMC5443074
OpenAlexW1983910991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.