Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25483677›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Mucin 1-specific active cancer immunotherapy with tecemotide (L-BLP25) in patients with multiple myeloma: an exploratory study.

Eva Rossmann, Anders Österborg, Eva Löfvenberg, Aniruddha Choudhury, Ulf Forssmann, Anja von Heydebreck, Andreas Schröder, Håkan Mellstedt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Advances in nano-immunotherapy for hematological malignancies.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Immunomodulatory Nanosystems.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Eva Rossmanna Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital ; Stockholm , Sweden.
Anders Österborg
Eva Löfvenberg
Aniruddha Choudhury
Ulf Forssmann
Anja von Heydebreck
Andreas Schröder
Håkan Mellstedt
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEMerck (Germany) · DEMerck Serono (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients (n = 34) with previously untreated, slowly progressive asymptomatic stage I/II multiple myeloma or with stage II/III multiple myeloma in stable response/plateau phase following conventional anti-tumor therapy were immunized repeatedly with the antigen-specific cancer immunotherapeutic agent tecemotide (L-BLP25). Additionally, patients were randomly allocated to either single or multiple low doses of cyclophosphamide to inhibit regulatory T cells (Treg). Immunization with tecemotide resulted in the induction/augmentation of a mucin 1-specific immune response in 47% of patients. The immune responses appeared to involve a Th1-like cellular immune response involving CD4 and CD8 T cells. The rate of immune responses was similar with single versus multiple dosing of cyclophosphamide and in patients with vs. without pre-existing mucin 1 immunity. On-treatment reductions in the slope of M-protein concentration over time (but not fulfilling clinical criteria for responses with conventional anti-tumor agents) were observed in 45% of evaluable patients, predominantly in those without versus with pre-existing mucin 1 immunity and in patients with early stage disease. No differences were seen in patients receiving single or multiple cyclophosphamide dosing. Treatment with tecemotide was generally well tolerated. Repeated vs. single dosing of cyclophosphamide had no impact on Treg numbers and was stopped after a case of fatal encephalitis that was assessed as possibly study-related. Tecemotide immunotherapy induces mucin 1-specific cellular immune responses in a substantial proportion of patients, with preliminary evidence of changes in the M-protein concentration time curve in a subset of patients.

Indexed as

AgedAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedMucin-1Multiple MyelomaRandom AllocationTh1 CellsT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCyclophosphamideL-BLP25Membrane GlycoproteinsMUC1 protein, humanMucin-1ASCI, antigen-specific cancer immunotherapyAUC, area under the curveCy, cyclophosphamideELISpot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent spotGM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factorHR, hazard ratioIDA, Immunologic Diagnostic AnalysisIFN-g, interferon-gIL-17, interleukin-17immunotherapyIQR, interquartile rangeL-BLP25MM, multiple myelomaMUC1MUC1, mucin 1mucin 1multiple myelomaNSCLC, non-small cell lung cancerPBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear celltecemotideTNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-αTreg, regulatory T cellURR, upper reference range

Identifiers

PMID25483677
PMCPMC4514088
OpenAlexW1975528710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.