Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25483625›Full record

ArticleCancer2015

US breast cancer mortality trends in young women according to race.

Foluso O Ademuyiwa, Feng Gao, Lin Hao, Daniel Morgensztern, Rebecca L Aft, Cynthia X Ma, Matthew J Ellis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gaps in care, support, and research among diverse patients with early onset cancers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Black Women's Perspectives on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2023
    Article
  9. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Breast cancer in young black women.The British journal of surgery · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Foluso O AdemuyiwaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Feng Gao
Lin Hao
Daniel Morgensztern
Rebecca L Aft
Cynthia X Ma
Matthew J Ellis

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Paul Calabresi K12 Career Development Award for Clinical OncologyK12CA167540 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI John F. Dipersio, Ramaswamy Govindan · 2012 to 2026
$11.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS 1K12CA167540NCI NIH HHS K12 CA167540NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung age at diagnosis has a negative prognostic impact on outcome in patients with breast cancer (BC). In the current study, the authors sought to determine whether there is a differential effect of race and examined mortality trends according to race and age.

methodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to identify women aged <50 years with invasive BC diagnosed between 1990 and 2009. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the risk-adjusted likelihood of survival for white and black patients. Annual hazards of BC death according to race and calendar period and adjusted relative hazards of death for white and black women stratified by age were computed.

resultsA total of 162,976 women were identified, 126,573 of whom were white, 20,405 of whom were black, and 15,998 of whom were of other races. At a median follow-up of 85 months, the 5-year disease specific survival rates were 90.1% for white patients and 79.3% for black patients. Annual hazards of death in white patients decreased by 26% at 5 years after diagnosis in contrast to the hazards in black patients, which decreased by only 19%. With 1990 as the referent year, the adjusted relative hazards of death in women aged <40 years in 2005 were 0.55 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.46-0.66) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.49-0.93), respectively, for white and black women. In women aged 40 to 49 years, adjusted hazards of death were 0.53 (95% CI, 0.47-0.60) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.61-0.99), respectively, for white and black women.

conclusionsAmong young women diagnosed with BC, black patients have a worse outcome compared with white patients. Mortality declines have been observed over time in both groups, although more rapid gains have been reported to occur in white women. Emphasis should be placed on improving outcomes for young patients with BC.

Indexed as

AdultBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRiskSEER ProgramUnited Statesbreast cancersurvivaltrendsyoung age

Identifiers

PMID25483625
PMCPMC4409464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.