Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25483518›Full record

SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2015

Effectiveness of interventions that apply new media to improve vaccine uptake and vaccine coverage.

Anna Odone, Antonio Ferrari, Francesca Spagnoli, Sara Visciarelli, Abigail Shefer, Cesira Pasquarella, Carlo Signorelli

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03890978 (Improving Exclusive Breastfeeding Via Mobile Phone Text Messages), which is not on this map. Cited by 108 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03890978 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Improving Exclusive Breastfeeding Via Mobile Phone Text Messages: a Randomized Controlled Trial in Southern Jordan

TypeinterventionalSponsorMutah UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled201ConditionsBreastfeedingArmspromotional Exclusive breastfeeding text messages
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Odonea Department S.Bi.Bi.T.; Unit of Public Health; University of Parma; Parma, Italy.
Antonio Ferrari
Francesca Spagnoli
Sara Visciarelli
Abigail Shefer
Cesira Pasquarella
Carlo Signorelli
University of Parma · ITWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe · DK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) are still a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In high and middle-income settings, immunization coverage is relatively high. However, in many countries coverage rates of routinely recommended vaccines are still below the targets established by international and national advisory committees. Progress in the field of communication technology might provide useful tools to enhance immunization strategies.

objectiveTo systematically collect and summarize the available evidence on the effectiveness of interventions that apply new media to promote vaccination uptake and increase vaccination coverage.

designWe conducted a systematic literature review. Studies published from January 1999 to September 2013 were identified by searching electronic resources (Pubmed, Embase), manual searches of references and expert consultation. Study setting We focused on interventions that targeted recommended vaccinations for children, adolescents and adults and: (1) aimed at increasing community demand for immunizations, or (2) were provider-based interventions. We limited the study setting to countries that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was a measure of vaccination (vaccine uptake or vaccine coverage). Considered secondary outcomes included willingness to receive immunization, attitudes and perceptions toward vaccination, and perceived helpfulness of the intervention.

resultsNineteen studies were included in the systematic review. The majority of the studies were conducted in the US (74%, n = 14); 68% (n = 13) of the studies were experimental, the rest having an observational study design. Eleven (58%) reported results on the primary outcome. Retrieved studies explored the role of: text messaging (n.7, 37%), smartphone applications (n.1, 5%), Youtube videos (n.1, 5%), Facebook (n.1, 5%), targeted websites and portals (n.4, 21%), software for physicians and health professionals (n.4, 21%), and email communication (n.1, 5%). There is some evidence that text messaging, accessing immunization campaign websites, using patient-held web-based portals and computerized reminders increase immunization coverage rates. Insufficient evidence is available on the use of social networks, email communication and smartphone applications.

conclusionAlthough there is great potential for improving vaccine uptake and vaccine coverage by implementing programs and interventions that apply new media, scant data are available and further rigorous research - including cost-effectiveness assessments - is needed.

Indexed as

Communications MediaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBehavior TherapyChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth EducationHealth Services ResearchHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyVaccinescommunication technologyimmunizationinterventionsnew mediasocial mediasystematic reviewvaccine coveragevaccine preventable diseasesvaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID25483518
PMCPMC4514191
OpenAlexW1906841348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.