Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25483503›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Impact of a physician recommendation.

Paul M Darden, Robert M Jacobson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characteristics of primary care practices by proportion of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2: a cross-sectional cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul M Dardena Department of Pediatrics; College of Medicine ; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center ; Oklahoma City , OK USA.
Robert M Jacobson
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HPV vaccination has failed to achieve uptake comparable to the other adolescent-specific vaccines. Gargano et al. conducted a survey of parents of adolescents in a single Georgia county and found uptake similar to national surveys. They also found among the most commonly cited reasons for receiving vaccines a recommendation from a health care provider and among the most commonly cited reasons for not getting any of the adolescent vaccines were concerns for adverse effects. Of note, they found that the recommendation for any one vaccine had a positive effect on the uptake of other vaccines. Their findings of the importance of provider recommendations matched findings from other studies of adolescent vaccines, infant vaccines, and adult vaccines. This is despite flaws in their study including a very poor response rate (effectively 4.5%) of those surveyed and in their reporting including a lack of details of survey methods. Local surveys of vaccination have much to offer the national and local discussion about immunization delivery and how delivery should be optimized, but such surveys should use standardized approaches as well as pursue more comprehensive investigations at the local level to address the nuances national complex-cluster surveys cannot.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleMeningococcal VaccinesPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesMeningococcal VaccinesPapillomavirus Vaccinesadolescentadolescent health servicesaOR, adjusted odds ratioattitude to healthCDC, Centers for Disease Control and Preventiondiphtheria-tetanus vaccineHPV, human papillomavirusimmunizationMCV, meningococcal conjugate vaccinemeningococcal vaccinesNIS-Teen, National Immunization Survey of TeensOR, odds ratiopapillomavirus vaccinespatient acceptance of health carepreventive health servicesTdap, tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccinetetanus toxoidtreatment refusalvaccinationvaccines

Identifiers

PMID25483503
PMCPMC4975061
OpenAlexW2151788368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.