Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25483474›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Protecting a new generation against HPV: are we willing to be bold?

Robin C Vanderpool, Richard A Crosby, Lindsay R Stradtman

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robin C Vanderpoola Department of Health Behavior ; University of Kentucky College of Public Health ; Lexington , KY USA.
Richard A Crosby
Lindsay R Stradtman

Funding

THE RURAL CANCER PREVENTION CENTER: CATEGORY 1 PROPOSALU48DP001932 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI CROSBY, RICHARD A · 2009 to 2013
$5.2M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the advent of a novel human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to prevent associated cancers, HPV vaccination rates in the United States (US) remain well below national goals. Two recent reports by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the President's Cancer Panel (PCP) have identified missed clinical opportunities as an intervention point for increasing HPV vaccination rates, including the provision of immunization in alternative venues by varying healthcare providers. In this paper, we specifically comment on the idea of offering HPV vaccination in emergency departments (ED) by emergency medicine (EM) physicians as posited by Hill and Okugo (2014), identifying both strengths and limitations to this strategy. We also offer ideas for additional research, suggest provider and healthcare systems changes, and discuss needed policy changes to improve HPV vaccination rates in the US.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEmergency Service, HospitalPhysiciansDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesACIP, Advisory Committee for Immunization Practicesalternative settingsCDC, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionED, emergency departmentEM, emergency medicineemergency departmentsHPV, human papillomavirusHPV vaccinationmissed clinical appointmentsPCP, President's Cancer PanelphysicianspolicyUS, United States

Identifiers

PMID25483474
PMCPMC4772861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.