Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25483305›Full record

ReviewSmall GTPases2014

Rho GTPases in embryonic development.

Philippe M Duquette, Nathalie Lamarche-Vane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small GTPases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effects of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Transcriptomic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Transcriptomic Analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Shining a light on RhoA: Optical control of cell contractility.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rho Kinases in Embryonic Development and Stem Cell Research.Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philippe M Duquettea McGill University ; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology ; Montreal , QC Canada.
Nathalie Lamarche-Vane

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-14701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, several mouse models for RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 have emerged and have contributed a great deal to understanding the precise functions of Rho GTPases at early stages of development. This review summarizes our current knowledge of various mouse models of tissue-specific ablation of Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA with emphasis on early embryogenesis, epithelial and skin morphogenesis, tubulogenesis, development of the central nervous system, and limb development.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentAnimalscdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMiceNeuropeptidesrac1 GTP-Binding ProteinrhoA GTP-Binding Proteinrho GTP-Binding Proteinscdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCdc42 protein, mouseNeuropeptidesrac1 GTP-Binding ProteinRac1 protein, mouserhoA GTP-Binding ProteinRhoA protein, mouserho GTP-Binding ProteinsCdc42cell fatecell migrationcell polaritycytoskeletonembryonic developmentmouse modelsRac1RhoAtubulogenesis

Identifiers

PMID25483305
PMCPMC4601498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.