Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25482949›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & therapy2014

Nanoparticles for the delivery of zoledronic acid to prostate cancer cells: a comparative analysis through time lapse video-microscopy technique.

Chiara Schiraldi, Silvia Zappavigna, Antonella D' Agostino, Stefania Porto, Ornella Gaito, Sara Lusa, Monica Lamberti, Mario De Rosa, Giuseppe De Rosa, Michele Caraglia

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara Schiraldia Department of Experimental Medicine; Section of Biotechnology, Medical Histology and Molecular Biology ; CGA Second University of Naples ; Naples , Italy.
Silvia Zappavigna
Antonella D' Agostino
Stefania Porto
Ornella Gaito
Sara Lusa
Monica Lamberti
Mario De Rosa
Giuseppe De Rosa
Michele Caraglia
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-lapse live cell imaging is a powerful tool for studying the responses of cells to drugs. Zoledronic acid (ZOL) is the most potent aminobiphosphonate able to induce cell growth inhibition at very low concentrations. The lack of clear evidence of ZOL-induced anti-cancer effects is likely due to its unfavorable pharmacokinetic profile. The use of nanotechnology-based formulations allows overcoming these limitations in ZOL pharmaco-distribution. Recently, stealth liposomes (LIPOs) and new self-assembly PEGylated nanoparticles (NPs) encapsulating ZOL were developed. Both the delivery systems showed promising anticancer activity in vitro and in vivo. In this work, we investigated the cytostatic effect of these novel formulations (LIPOs and NPs) compared with free ZOL on 2 different prostate cancer cell lines, PC 3 and DU 145 and on prostate epithelial primary cells EPN using time lapse video-microscopy (TLVM). In PC3 cells, free ZOL showed a significant anti-proliferative effect but this effect was lower than that induced by LIPOs and NPs encapsulating ZOL; moreover, LIPO-ZOL was more potent in inducing growth inhibition than NP-ZOL. On the other hand, LIPO-ZOL slightly enhanced the free ZOL activity on growth inhibition of DU 145, while the anti-proliferative effect of NP-ZOL was not statistically relevant. These novel formulations did not induce anti-proliferative effects on EPN cells. Finally, we evaluated cytotoxic effects on DU145 where, LIPO-ZOL induced the highest cytotoxicity compared with NP-ZOL and free ZOL. In conclusion, ZOL can be transformed in a powerful anticancer agent, if administered with nanotechnology-based formulations without damaging the healthy tissues.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNanoparticlesAntineoplastic AgentsBone Density Conservation AgentsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationChemistry, PharmaceuticalDiphosphonatesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CompoundingHumansImidazolesLiposomesMaleProstatic NeoplasmsTime-Lapse ImagingAntineoplastic AgentsBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesImidazolesLiposomesZoledronic AcidblankLIPOs, empty pegylated liposomesCaP, calcium/phosphatecell biologycell toxicitydrug deliveryFPPS, farnesyl pirophosphate synthaseLIPOs, stealth liposomesLIPO-ZOL, stealth liposomes encapsulating ZOLmotilitynanotechnologynanotoxicologyNBPs, bisphosphonatesNPs, nanoparticlesprostate cancerself-assembly PEGylated nanoparticlesstealth liposomesTAM, tumor associated macrophagestime lapse video-microscopyTLVM, time lapse videomicroscopyzoledronic acidZOL, zoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID25482949
PMCPMC4623011
OpenAlexW1982510467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.