Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25482935›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & therapy2014

Increasing cisplatin sensitivity by schedule-dependent inhibition of AKT and Chk1.

Lei Duan, Ricardo E Perez, Michael Hansen, Steven Gitelis, Carl G Maki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. TIMP3 regulates osteosarcoma cell migration, invasion, and chemotherapeutic resistances.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei Duana Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology ; Rush University Medical Center ; Chicago , IL USA.
Ricardo E Perez
Michael Hansen
Steven Gitelis
Carl G Maki
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

Cellular Responses to p53 Activation by Nutlin-3aR01CA137598 · NCI · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAKI, CARL G · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA137598-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA137598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of DNA damaging chemotherapy drugs can be limited by activation of survival signaling pathways and cell cycle checkpoints that allow DNA repair. Targeting survival pathways and inhibiting cell cycle checkpoints may increase chemotherapy-induced cancer cell killing. AKT and Chk1 are survival and cell cycle checkpoint kinases, respectively, that can be activated by DNA damage. Cisplatin (CP) is a standard chemotherapy agent for osteosarcoma (OS). CP induced apoptosis to varying extents and activated AKT and Chk1 in multiple p53 wild-type and p53-null OS cell lines. A Chk1 inhibitor increased CP-induced apoptosis in all OS cell lines regardless of p53 status. In contrast, an AKT inhibitor increased CP-induced apoptosis only in p53 wild-type OS cells, but not p53 nulll cells. The increased apoptosis in p53 wild-type cells was coincident with decreased p53 protein levels, but increased expression of p53-responsive apoptotic genes Noxa and PUMA. Further studies revealed the inability of AKT inhibitor to CP-sensitize p53-null OS cells resulted from 2 things: 1) AKT inhibition stabilized/maintained p27 levels in CP-treated cells, which then mediated a protective G1-phase cell cycle arrest, 2) AKT inhibition increased the levels of activated Chk1. Finally, schedule dependent inhibition of AKT and Chk1 evaded the protective G1 arrest mediated by p27 and maximized CP-induced OS cell killing. These data demonstrate AKT and Chk1 activation promote survival in CP-treated OS cells, and that strategic, scheduled targeting of AKT and Chk1 can maximize OS cell killing by CP.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Line, TumorCheckpoint Kinase 1CisplatinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27DNA DamageEnzyme ActivationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Knockdown TechniquesHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansPhosphorylationProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanCisplatinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingMK 2206Protein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRNA, Small InterferingTumor Suppressor Protein p53AKTapoptosisCDC2, cell division cycle kinase 2Chk1Chk1, Checkpoint kinase 1cisplatinmTORC1 and mTORC2, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 and 2osteosarcomap53

Identifiers

PMID25482935
PMCPMC4623033
OpenAlexW2042577464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.