Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25482267›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2015

The contribution of pre-stimulus neural oscillatory activity to spontaneous response time variability.

Aline Bompas, Petroc Sumner, Suresh D Muthumumaraswamy, Krish D Singh, Iain D Gilchrist

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aline BompasCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK; INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, Hopital du Vinatier, 95 Boulevard Pinel, Bron, 69500, France. Electronic address: aline.bompas@gmail.com.
Petroc SumnerCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.
Suresh D MuthumumaraswamyCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK; School of Pharmacy and Psychology, Auckland University, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Krish D SinghCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.
Iain D GilchristSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol BS7 8SW, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/K005464/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large variability between individual response times, even in identical conditions, is a ubiquitous property of animal behavior. However, the origins of this stochasticity and its relation to action decisions remain unclear. Here we focus on the state of the perception-action network in the pre-stimulus period and its influence on subsequent saccadic response time and choice in humans. We employ magnetoencephalography (MEG) and a correlational source reconstruction approach to identify the brain areas where pre-stimulus oscillatory activity predicted saccadic response time to visual targets. We find a relationship between future response time and pre-stimulus power, but not phase, in occipital (including V1), parietal, posterior cingulate and superior frontal cortices, consistently across alpha, beta and low gamma frequencies, each accounting for between 1 and 4% of the RT variance. Importantly, these correlations were not explained by deterministic sources of variance, such as experimental factors and trial history. Our results further suggest that occipital areas mainly reflect short-term (trial to trial) stochastic fluctuations, while the frontal contribution largely reflects longer-term effects such as fatigue or practice. Parietal areas reflect fluctuations at both time scales. We found no evidence of lateralization: these effects were indistinguishable in both hemispheres and for both saccade directions, and non-predictive of choice - a finding with fundamental consequences for models of action decision, where independent, not coupled, noise is normally assumed.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingDecision MakingEye MovementsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyMaleNerve NetPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSaccadesStochastic ProcessesVisual CortexAmplitudeDecisionFree choiceMEGPhaseSaccades

Identifiers

PMID25482267
PMCPMC4306532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.