Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25482078›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2015

Factors influencing ovulation and the risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Joanne Kotsopoulos, Jan Lubinski, Jacek Gronwald, Cezary Cybulski, Rochelle Demsky, Susan L Neuhausen, Charmaine Kim-Sing, Nadine Tung, Susan Friedman, Leigha Senter and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Contemporary risk assessment and risk-reducing strategies for tubo-ovarian cancer in women with BRCA pathogenic variants.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Risk Factors for Ovarian Cancer by BRCA Status: A Collaborative Case-Only Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Molecular Management of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Joanne KotsopoulosFamilial Breast Cancer Unit, Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jan LubinskiInternational Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Jacek GronwaldInternational Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Cezary CybulskiInternational Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Rochelle DemskyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Susan L NeuhausenDepartment of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA.
Charmaine Kim-SingBC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nadine TungDivision of Hematology Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Susan FriedmanDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Leigha SenterDivision of Human Genetics, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
Jeffrey WeitzelDivision of Clinical Cancer Genetics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Beth KarlanWomen's Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Pal MollerInherited Cancer Research Group, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Department for Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ping SunFamilial Breast Cancer Unit, Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Steven A NarodFamilial Breast Cancer Unit, Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group

Funding

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BREAST CANCER--BRCA1 AND BRCA2R01CA074415 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NEUHAUSEN, SUSAN L. · 1998 to 2007
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA074415NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 74415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the lifetime number of ovulatory cycles has not been evaluated in the context of BRCA-associated ovarian cancer. Thus, we conducted a matched case-control study to evaluate the relationship between the cumulative number of ovulatory cycles (and contributing components) and risk of developing ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers (1,329 cases and 5,267 controls). Information regarding reproductive and hormonal factors was collected from a routinely administered questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate all associations. We observed a 45% reduction in the risk of developing ovarian cancer among women in the lowest vs. highest quartile of ovulatory cycles (OR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.41-0.75, p = 0.0001). Breastfeeding for more than 12 months was associated with a 38% (95% CI 0.48-0.79) and 50% (95% CI 0.29-0.84) reduction in risk among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. For oral contraceptive use, maximum benefit was seen with five or more years of use among BRCA1 mutation carriers (OR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.40-0.63) and three or more years for BRCA2 mutation carriers (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.22-0.83). Increasing parity was associated with a significant inverse trend among BRCA1 (OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.96; p-trend = 0.005) but not BRCA2 mutation carriers (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.81-1.19; p-trend = 0.85). A later age at menopause was associated with an increased risk in women with a BRCA1 mutation (OR trend = 1.18; 95% CI 1.03-1.35; p = 0.02). These findings support an important role of breastfeeding and oral contraceptive use for the primary prevention of ovarian cancer among women carrying BRCA mutations.

Indexed as

MutationBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast FeedingCase-Control StudiesContraceptionFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLogistic ModelsOvarian NeoplasmsOvulationParityPregnancyRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1BRCA2ovarian cancerovulation

Identifiers

PMID25482078
PMCPMC4458227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.