Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25482066›Full record

ArticleNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2014

Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos.

Jens Popken, Alessandro Brero, Daniela Koehler, Volker J Schmid, Axel Strauss, Annegret Wuensch, Tuna Guengoer, Alexander Graf, Stefan Krebs, Helmut Blum and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Balance of osmotic pressures determines the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic volume ratio of the cell.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Manipulating the Epigenome in Nuclear Transfer Cloning: Where, When and How.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jens Popkena Division of Anthropology and Human Genetics ; Biocenter; LMU Munich ; Munich , Germany.
Alessandro Brero
Daniela Koehler
Volker J Schmid
Axel Strauss
Annegret Wuensch
Tuna Guengoer
Alexander Graf
Stefan Krebs
Helmut Blum
Valeri Zakhartchenko
Eckhard Wolf
Thomas Cremer
LMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear landscapes were studied during preimplantation development of bovine embryos, generated either by in vitro fertilization (IVF), or generated as cloned embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) of bovine fetal fibroblasts, using 3-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy (3D-CLSM) and structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM). Nuclear landscapes of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were compared with each other and with fibroblast nuclei. We demonstrate that reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned embryos requires changes of their landscapes similar to nuclei of IVF embryos. On the way toward the 8-cell stage, where major genome activation occurs, a major lacuna, enriched with splicing factors, was formed in the nuclear interior and chromosome territories (CTs) were shifted toward the nuclear periphery. During further development the major lacuna disappeared and CTs were redistributed throughout the nuclear interior forming a contiguous higher order chromatin network. At all stages of development CTs of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were built up from chromatin domain clusters (CDCs) pervaded by interchromatin compartment (IC) channels. Quantitative analyses revealed a highly significant enrichment of RNA polymerase II and H3K4me3, a marker for transcriptionally competent chromatin, at the periphery of CDCs. In contrast, H3K9me3, a marker for silent chromatin, was enriched in the more compacted interior of CDCs. Despite these striking similarities, we also detected major differences between nuclear landscapes of IVF and cloned embryos. Possible implications of these differences for the developmental potential of cloned animals remain to be investigated. We present a model, which integrates generally applicable structural and functional features of the nuclear landscape.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroNuclear Transfer TechniquesAnimalsCattleCell NucleusCellular ReprogrammingChromatinChromosomesCloning, OrganismEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentFibroblastsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseRNA Polymerase IIChromatinHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseRNA Polymerase II3D-CLSM, 3-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy3D-SIM, 3-dimensional structured illumination microscopyB23, nucleophosmin B23bovine preimplantation developmentBTA, Bos taurusCDC, chromatin domain clusterchromatin domainchromosome territoryCT, chromosome territoryembryonic genome activationEM, electron microscopyENC, embryonic nuclei with conventional nuclear architectureENP, embryonic nuclei with peripheral CT distributionH3K4me3H3K4me3, histone H3 with tri-methylated lysine 4H3K9me3H3K9me3, histone H3 with tri-methylated lysine 9H3S10p, histone H3 with phosphorylated serine 10IC, interchromatin compartmentinterchromatin compartmentin vitro fertilization (IVF)IVF, in vitro fertilizationmajor EGA, major embryonic genome activationMCB, major chromatin bodyPR, perichromatin regionRNA polymerase IIRNA polymerase II-S2p, RNA polymerase II with phosphorylated serine 2 of its CTD domainRNA polymerase II-S5p, RNA polymerase II with phosphorylated serine 5 of its CTD domainSC-35, splicing factor SC-35SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer.somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)

Identifiers

PMID25482066
PMCPMC4615760
OpenAlexW2089186358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.