ArticleBMC genomics2014
Dynamics in the resistant and susceptible peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) root transcriptome on infection with the Ralstonia solanacearum.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic insights into bacterial wilt resistance using genomic prediction and association mapping in blueberry.The plant genome · 2026Article
- AhBWR15, A Novel RLK Gene, Confers Resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum in Peanut.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis revealed the response of resistant variety Zhonghua 6 to the infection of Ralstonia solanacearum in peanut.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of the SAMS gene family in peanut reveal the role of Ah6Q1KS5 in resistance to bacterial wilt.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Precision Breeding in Peanut (Insects · 2026Review
- The Homocysteine S-Methyltransferase Family and Functional Analysis ofJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Article
- Review
- Jasmonic acid-mediated cell wall biosynthesis pathway involved in pepper (Capsicum annuum) defense response to Ralstonia solanacearum.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Genome-wide characterization of AhBAG genes in peanut reveals their role in bacterial wilt resistance and hormone response.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Naringenin restricts the colonization and growth of Ralstonia solanacearum in tobacco mutant KCB-1.Plant physiology · 2024Article
- Transcriptome-WidePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Transcriptome sequencing and expression analysis in peanut reveal the potential mechanism response to Ralstonia solanacearum infection.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Induced defense strategies of plants againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Advances in omics research on peanut response to biotic stresses.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- The genusFrontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Gene Co-expression Network Analysis of the Comparative Transcriptome Identifies Hub Genes Associated With Resistance toFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- WRKY genes provide novel insights into their role againstFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Comparative transcriptome analysis revealed molecular mechanisms of peanut leaves responding toFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Complete Genome Sequence Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Defense-Related Gene Expression Following an Orthotospovirus Infection Is Influenced by Host Resistance inViruses · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is a serious soil-borne disease of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). The molecular basis of peanut response to R. solanacearum remains unknown. To understand the resistance mechanism behind peanut resistance to R. solanacearum, we used RNA-Seq to perform global transcriptome profiling on the roots of peanut resistant (R) and susceptible (S) genotypes under R. solanacearum infection.
resultsA total of 4.95 x 108 raw sequence reads were generated and subsequently assembled into 271, 790 unigenes with an average length of 890 bp and a N50 of 1, 665 bp. 179, 641 unigenes could be annotated by public protein databases. The pairwise transcriptome comparsions of time course (6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h post inoculation) were conducted 1) between inoculated and control samples of each genotype, 2) between inoculated samples of R and S genotypes. The linear dynamics of transcriptome profile was observed between adjacent samples for each genotype, two genotypes shared similar transcriptome pattern at early time points with most significant up regulation at 12 hour, and samples from R genotype at 24 h and S genotype at 48 h showed similar transcriptome pattern, significant differences of transcriptional profile were observed in pairwise comparisons between R and S genotypes. KEGG analysis showed that the primary metabolisms were inhibited in both genotypes and stronger inhibition in R genotype post inoculation. The defense related genes (R gene, LRR-RLK, cell wall genes, etc.) generally showed a genotype-specific down regulation and different expression between both genotypes.
conclusionThis transcriptome profiling provided the largest data set that explores the dynamic in crosstalk between peanut and R. solanacearum. The results suggested that the down-regulation of primary metabolism is contributed to the resistance difference between R and S genotypes. The genotype-specific expression pattern of defense related DEGs also contributed to the resistance difference between R and S genotype. This study will strongly contribute to better understand the molecular interaction between plant and R. solanacearum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.