Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25481416›Full record

ArticleBrain research2015

Optogenetic stimulation of the cochlear nucleus using channelrhodopsin-2 evokes activity in the central auditory pathways.

Keith N Darrow, Michaël C C Slama, Elliott D Kozin, Maryanna Owoc, Kenneth Hancock, Judith Kempfle, Albert Edge, Stephanie Lacour, Edward Boyden, Daniel Polley and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical and scientific innovations in auditory brainstem implants.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2021
    Review
  2. Animal Models of Tinnitus Treatment: Cochlear and Brain Stimulation.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Optical stimulation of neural tissue.Healthcare technology letters · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Optogenetics for neurodegenerative diseases.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Keith N DarrowDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Worcester State University, Worcester, MA, USA; Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Michaël C C SlamaEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USAs.
Elliott D KozinDepartment of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USAs; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Maryanna OwocDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Worcester State University, Worcester, MA, USA.
Kenneth HancockDepartment of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USAs.
Judith KempfleEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USAs.
Albert EdgeEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USAs.
Stephanie LacourLaboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces, Center for Neuroprosthetics, IMT/IBI, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Edward BoydenDepartments of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Biological Engineering, MIT Media Lab and McGovern Institute, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Daniel PolleyEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USAs.
M Christian BrownEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USAs.
Daniel J LeeDepartment of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USAs; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: Daniel_Lee@meei.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USEaton (United States) · USÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · US

Funding

Activity-Dependent Influences on Auditory CircuitsR01DC009836 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI POLLEY, DANIEL B. · 2009 to 2024
$6.7M
DESCENDING SYSTEMS TO THE COCHLEA AND COCHLEAR NUCLEUSR01DC001089 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI BROWN, M. CHRISTIAN · 1991 to 2019
$5.9M
Cellular therapy for the inner earR01DC007174 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI EDGE, ALBERT · 2005 to 2017
$4.6M
A chemical-genetic approach to decipher the function of corticothalamic feedbackR21DC012894 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI POLLEY, DANIEL B. · 2013 to 2014
$449k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC01089NIDCD NIH HHS DC012894NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001089NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007174NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009836NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC012894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optogenetics has become an important research tool and is being considered as the basis for several neural prostheses. However, few studies have applied optogenetics to the auditory brainstem. This study explored whether optical activation of the cochlear nucleus (CN) elicited responses in neurons in higher centers of the auditory pathway and whether it elicited an evoked response. Viral-mediated gene transfer was used to express channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) in the mouse CN. Blue light was delivered via an optical fiber placed near the surface of the infected CN and recordings were made in higher-level centers. Optical stimulation evoked excitatory multiunit spiking activity throughout the tonotopic axis of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (IC) and the auditory cortex (Actx). The pattern and magnitude of IC activity elicited by optical stimulation was comparable to that obtained with a 50dB SPL acoustic click. This broad pattern of activity was consistent with histological confirmation of green fluorescent protein (GFP) label of cell bodies and axons throughout the CN. Increasing pulse rates up to 320Hz did not significantly affect threshold or bandwidth of the IC responses, but rates higher than 50Hz resulted in desynchronized activity. Optical stimulation also evoked an auditory brainstem response, which had a simpler waveform than the response to acoustic stimulation. Control cases showed no responses to optical stimulation. These data suggest that optogenetic control of central auditory neurons is feasible, but opsins with faster channel kinetics may be necessary to convey information at rates typical of many auditory signals.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysChannelrhodopsinsCochlear NucleusElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFeasibility StudiesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInferior ColliculiMice, Inbred CBANeuronsOptogeneticsPhotic StimulationChannelrhodopsinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsAuditory cortexChR2Inferior colliculusNeural prosthesisSynchronization index

Identifiers

PMID25481416
PMCPMC4859340
OpenAlexW2167120218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.