Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25481005›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2015

Intravenous and gastric cerium dioxide nanoparticle exposure disrupts microvascular smooth muscle signaling.

Valerie C Minarchick, Phoebe A Stapleton, Natalie R Fix, Stephen S Leonard, Edward M Sabolsky, Timothy R Nurkiewicz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nanoparticles: Taking a Unique Position in Medicine.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Maternal exposure to CeOJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nanoparticles in Medicine: A Focus on Vascular Oxidative Stress.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2018
    Review
  9. A comparative study of toxicity of TiOInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2018
    Article
  10. Cerium oxide nanoparticles in neuroprotection and considerations for efficacy and safety.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Metal Nanomaterial Toxicity Variations Within the Vascular System.Current environmental health reports · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valerie C Minarchick*Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 *Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506.
Phoebe A Stapleton*Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 *Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506.
Natalie R Fix*Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506.
Stephen S Leonard*Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506.
Edward M Sabolsky*Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506.
Timothy R Nurkiewicz*Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 *Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 *Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 tnurkiewicz@hsc.wvu.edu.

Funding

Remote Microvascular Dysfunction After Particulate Matter ExposureR01ES015022 · NIEHS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI NURKIEWICZ, TIMOTHY R · 2007 to 2021
$4.9M
Vascular Consequences of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube ExposureF32ES023435 · NIEHS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI STAPLETON, PHOEBE · 2013 to 2014
$95k
NIEHS NIH HHS F32 ES023435NIEHS NIH HHS F32-ES023435NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015022NIEHS NIH HHS R01-ES015022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerium dioxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NP) hold great therapeutic potential, but the in vivo effects of non-pulmonary exposure routes are unclear. The first aim was to determine whether microvascular function is impaired after intravenous and gastric CeO2 NP exposure. The second aim was to investigate the mechanism(s) of action underlying microvascular dysfunction following CeO2 NP exposure. Rats were exposed to CeO2 NP (primary diameter: 4 ± 1 nm, surface area: 81.36 m(2)/g) by intratracheal instillation, intravenous injection, or gastric gavage. Mesenteric arterioles were harvested 24 h post-exposure and vascular function was assessed using an isolated arteriole preparation. Endothelium-dependent and independent function and vascular smooth muscle (VSM) signaling (soluble guanylyl cyclase [sGC] and cyclic guanosine monophosphate [cGMP]) were assessed. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and nitric oxide (NO) production were analyzed. Compared with controls, endothelium-dependent and independent dilation were impaired following intravenous injection (by 61% and 45%) and gastric gavage (by 63% and 49%). However, intravenous injection resulted in greater microvascular impairment (16% and 35%) compared with gastric gavage at an identical dose (100 µg). Furthermore, sGC activation and cGMP responsiveness were impaired following pulmonary, intravenous, and gastric CeO2 NP treatment. Finally, nanoparticle exposure resulted in route-dependent, increased ROS generation and decreased NO production. These results indicate that CeO2 NP exposure route differentially impairs microvascular function, which may be mechanistically linked to decreased NO production and subsequent VSM signaling. Fully understanding the mechanisms behind CeO2 NP in vivo effects is a critical step in the continued therapeutic development of this nanoparticle.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAdministration, InhalationAdministration, OralAnimalsArteriolesCeriumCyclic GMPDose-Response Relationship, DrugEpithelial CellsGuanylate CyclaseInjections, IntravenousIntubation, GastrointestinalMaleMesenteryMuscle, Smooth, VascularMyocytes, Smooth Muscleceric oxideCeriumCyclic GMPGuanylate CyclaseNitric OxideReactive Oxygen SpeciesReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearSoluble Guanylyl Cyclasecerium dioxide nanoparticles; microvascular function; nitric oxide; mesentery

Identifiers

PMID25481005
PMCPMC4349137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.