ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015
Point and counterpoint: patient control of access to data in their electronic health records.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01862133 (Aspiring to Awesome- Patient Preference Privacy Selections in EMR), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Aspiring to Awesome- Patient Preference Privacy Selections in EMR
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electronic health records in patient care: strengths, facilitators, challenges, and future directions-a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Collection and sharing of health information in mental health and related systems in Australia: perspectives of people who access mental health services.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Patient Privacy Perspectives on Health Information Exchange in a Mental Health Context: Qualitative Study.JMIR mental health · 2019Article
- Assessment of Doctors' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Confidentiality in Hospital Care.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- De facto diagnosis specialties: Recognition and discovery.Learning health systems · 2018Article
- Data Withholding in the Age of Digital Health.The Milbank quarterly · 2017Article
- iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- Too Much or Too Little? How Much Control Should Patients Have Over EHR Data?Journal of medical systems · 2016Article
- Article
- You, me, and the computer makes three: navigating the doctor-patient relationship in the age of electronic health records.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Information collection, storage, and management is central to the practice of health care. For centuries, patients' and providers' expectations kept medical records confidential between providers and patients. With the advent of electronic health records, patient health information has become more widely available to providers and health care managers and has broadened its potential use beyond individual patient care. Adhering to the principles of Fair Information Practice, including giving patients control over the availability and use of their individual health records, would improve care by fostering the sharing of sensitive information between patients and providers. However, adherence to such principles could put patients at risk for unsafe care as a result of both missed opportunities for providing needed care as well as provision of contraindicated care, as it would prevent health care providers from having full access to health information. Patients' expectations for the highest possible quality and safety of care, therefore, may be at odds with their desire to limit provider access to their health records. Conversely, provider expectations that patients would willingly seek care for embarrassing conditions and disclose sensitive information may be at odds with patients' information privacy rights. An open dialogue between patients and providers will be necessary to balance respect for patient rights with provider need for patient information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.