ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015
Patient preferences in controlling access to their electronic health records: a prospective cohort study in primary care.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01862133 (Aspiring to Awesome- Patient Preference Privacy Selections in EMR), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Aspiring to Awesome- Patient Preference Privacy Selections in EMR
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Process Related View on the Usage of Electronic Health Records from the Patients' Perspective: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2022Pooled it
- State of the art and a mixed-method personalized approach to assess patient perceptions on medical record sharing and sensitivity.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020Pooled it
- Leveraging EHRs for patient engagement: perspectives on tailored program outreach.The American journal of managed care · 2017Trial
- Multimodal Integration in Health Care: Development With Applications in Disease Management.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
- Service Users' Perspectives on an Integrated Electronic Care Record in Mental Health Care: Qualitative Vignette and Interview Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Collection and sharing of health information in mental health and related systems in Australia: perspectives of people who access mental health services.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 2): Focus Group Study.JMIR mental health · 2022Article
- Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 1): Focus Group Study.JMIR mental health · 2022Article
- Foundations for Meaningful Consent in Canada's Digital Health Ecosystem: Retrospective Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Uses of Personal Health Records for Communication Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors, Caregivers, and Providers: Interview and Observational Study in a Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- Mental health professionals' perceptions on patients control of data sharing.Health informatics journal · 2020Article
- Pilot evaluation of sensitive data segmentation technology for privacy.International journal of medical informatics · 2020Article
- Open Humans: A platform for participant-centered research and personal data exploration.GigaScience · 2019Review
- Insights Into Older Adult Patient Concerns Around the Caregiver Proxy Portal Use: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Utilizing a Prototype Patient-Controlled Electronic Health Record in Germany: Qualitative Analysis of User-Reported Perceptions and Perspectives.JMIR formative research · 2018Article
- GRANULAR PATIENT CONTROL OF PERSONAL HEALTH INFORMATION: FEDERAL AND STATE LAW CONSIDERATIONS.Jurimetrics · 2018Article
- Ethical perspectives on recommending digital technology for patients with mental illness.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2017Review
- Perspectives of Patients With Cancer on the Ethics of Rapid-Learning Health Systems.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017Article
- Ethical and Clinical Issues in Integrated Care Settings: Patient Privacy Concerns and Electronic Health Records.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrevious studies have measured individuals' willingness to share personal information stored in electronic health records (EHRs) with health care providers, but none has measured preferences among patients when they are allowed to determine the parameters of provider access.
methodsPatients were given the ability to control access by doctors, nurses, and other staff in a primary care clinic to personal information stored in an EHR. Patients could restrict access to all personal data or to specific types of sensitive information, and could restrict access for a specific time period. Patients also completed a survey regarding their understanding of and opinions regarding the process.
resultsOf 139 eligible patients who were approached, 105 (75.5 %) were enrolled, and preferences were collected from all 105 (100 %). Sixty patients (57 %) did not restrict access for any providers. Of the 45 patients (43 %) who chose to limit the access of at least one provider, 36 restricted access only to all personal information in the EHR, while nine restricted access of some providers to a subset of the their personal information. Thirty-four (32.3 %) patients blocked access to all personal information by all doctors, nurses, and/or other staff, 26 (24.8 %) blocked access by all doctors and/or nurses, and five (4.8 %) denied access to all doctors, nurses, and staff.
conclusionsA significant minority of patients chose to restrict access by their primary care providers to personal information contained in an EHR, and few chose to restrict access to specific types of information. More research is needed to identify patient goals and understanding of the implications when facing decisions of this sort, and to identify the impact of patient education regarding information contained in EHRs and their use in the clinical care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.