Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25480602›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015

Six month outcomes in patients experiencing weight gain after gastric bypass who underwent gastrojejunal revision using an endoluminal suturing device.

M Gitelis, M Ujiki, L Farwell, J Linn, C Wang, K Miller, C Sula, J Carbray, S Haggerty, W Denham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M GitelisSection of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 2650 Ridge Ave, 60201, Evanston, IL, USA, mgitelis2@northshore.org.
M Ujiki
L Farwell
J Linn
C Wang
K Miller
C Sula
J Carbray
S Haggerty
W Denham
NorthShore University HealthSystem · USEvanston Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeight gain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass occurs in approximately 25 % of cases, and this may contribute to recurrence of comorbid conditions. Currently, adequate treatment strategies for this group of patients are limited. Endoscopic narrowing of the gastrojejunal anastomosis may result in a low-risk, minimally invasive treatment alternative compared to standard surgical revision. We assessed short-term outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions (EGJR) using an endoluminal suturing device.

methodsWe performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis of 25 consecutive patients who underwent EGJR. Patients preoperatively presented with a dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis of greater than 15 mm and weight gain. An endoluminal suturing device (Overstitch(TM), Apollo Endosurgery, Austin TX) was used to reduce the diameter of the anastomosis. Follow-up occurred at 2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 year

resultsPrior to EGJR, patients regained an average of 23.4 ± 13.2 kg from their weight loss nadir and had a mean body mass index of 42.2 ± 6.6 kg/m(2). At 6 weeks, 100 % of patients experienced weight loss (average 5.8 ± 4.4 kg; p < .001). At 3 months, 94 % had weight loss (average 7.0 ± 6.2 kg; p < .001). At 6 months, 91 % maintained weight loss (average 5.6 ± 6.2 kg; p = 0.013). Lastly, at 1 year following EGJR, 100 % of available cases maintained weight loss (average 7.5 ± 6.4 kg; p = 0.057). The average percent excess weight loss was 12.5, 15.4, 12.4, and 17.1 % at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. There was a negative time effect in the mixed effect model using both on-treatment and intent-to-treat analyses, illustrating a significant weight reduction over time. The average follow-up per patient was 146 days. There were no complications reported during the follow-up period.

conclusionsSix month follow-up for EGJR patients demonstrated a low-risk, minimally invasive treatment option to reverse weight gain subsequent to a failed gastric bypass. Procedures presented no complications and may provide an attractive alternative to standard surgical revision.

Indexed as

FemaleGastric BypassHumansIllinoisJejunumMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesStomachSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID25480602
OpenAlexW2056543738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.