ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015
SMARTS: reconstructing disease response networks from multiple individuals using time series gene expression data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Time-Series Transcriptomic Gene Expression Based on Long Short-Term Memory with Empirical Mode Decomposition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Adrenergic signaling controls early transcriptional programs during CD8+ T cell responses to viral infection.PloS one · 2022Article
- rmRNAseq: differential expression analysis for repeated-measures RNA-seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Comparative analysis of differential gene expression tools for RNA sequencing time course data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Trendy: segmented regression analysis of expression dynamics in high-throughput ordered profiling experiments.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Integrated time course omics analysis distinguishes immediate therapeutic response from acquired resistance.Genome medicine · 2018Article
- Insight into Genes Regulating Postharvest Aflatoxin Contamination of Tetraploid Peanut from Transcriptional Profiling.Genetics · 2018Article
- Dynamic modeling of transcriptional gene regulatory network uncovers distinct pathways during the onset of Arabidopsis leaf senescence.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2018Article
- DynOmics to identify delays and co-expression patterns across time course experiments.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Dynamics in Transcriptomics: Advancements in RNA-seq Time Course and Downstream Analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCurrent methods for reconstructing dynamic regulatory networks are focused on modeling a single response network using model organisms or cell lines. Unlike these models or cell lines, humans differ in their background expression profiles due to age, genetics and life factors. In addition, there are often differences in start and end times for time series human data and in the rate of progress based on the specific individual. Thus, new methods are required to integrate time series data from multiple individuals when modeling and constructing disease response networks.
resultsWe developed Scalable Models for the Analysis of Regulation from Time Series (SMARTS), a method integrating static and time series data from multiple individuals to reconstruct condition-specific response networks in an unsupervised way. Using probabilistic graphical models, SMARTS iterates between reconstructing different regulatory networks and assigning individuals to these networks, taking into account varying individual start times and response rates. These models can be used to group different sets of patients and to identify transcription factors that differentiate the observed responses between these groups. We applied SMARTS to analyze human response to influenza and mouse brain development. In both cases, it was able to greatly improve baseline groupings while identifying key relevant TFs that differ between the groups. Several of these groupings and TFs are known to regulate the relevant processes while others represent novel hypotheses regarding immune response and development. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software and Supplementary information are available at http://sb.cs.cmu.edu/smarts/. CONTACT: zivbj@cs.cmu.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.