Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25479938›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2015

Immunohistochemical expression of myoepithelial markers in adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: a unique paradoxical staining pattern of high-molecular weight cytokeratins.

Suzuko Moritani, Shu Ichihara, Yasushi Yatabe, Masaki Hasegawa, Akari Iwakoshi, Waki Hosoda, Michihiko Narita, Yuichiro Nagai, Masami Asai, Nobuko Ujihira and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Papillary neoplasms of the breast-reviewing the spectrum.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Proteomics and its applications in breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Lobulated adenomyoepithelioma: a case report showing immunohistochemical profiles.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzuko MoritaniDepartment of Advanced Diagnosis, Division of Pathology, Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1, Sannomaru, Naka-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 460-0001, Japan, MoritaniS@aol.com.
Shu Ichihara
Yasushi Yatabe
Masaki Hasegawa
Akari Iwakoshi
Waki Hosoda
Michihiko Narita
Yuichiro Nagai
Masami Asai
Nobuko Ujihira
Yoshiaki Yuba
Mayumi Jijiwa
Nagoya Medical Center · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPKitano Hospital · JPNagoya Ekisaikai Hospital · JPTeikyo University Chiba Medical Center · JPToyota Kosei Hospital · JPUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine which immunohistochemical markers are useful for the identification of neoplastic myoepithelial cells in adenomyoepithelioma of the breast, the expression of seven myoepithelial markers (α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), calponin, p63, CD10, cytokeratin 5/6, cytokeratin 14, and S-100) was examined in 19 lesions from 16 patients. The lesion consisted of seven spindle and 12 clear cell lesions. For normal myoepithelial cells, α-SMA, calponin, and p63 were significantly more sensitive than cytokeratin 5/6, cytokeratin 14, and S-100. There was no significant difference in the expression of α-SMA, calponin, p63, and CD10 in neoplastic myoepithelial cells of adenomyoepithelioma regardless of spindle or clear cell types. In spindle cell lesions, high-molecular weight cytokeratins (HMWCK; cytokeratin 5/6 and cytokeratin 14) tended to show higher staining scores and S-100 showed lower staining scores than other markers. In clear cell lesions, HMWCK showed significantly lower staining scores than the other five markers. There was no significant difference in staining scores among the other five markers. HMWCK showed a unique paradoxical staining pattern in clear cell lesions, with diffusely positive inner epithelial cells and completely negative outer myoepithelial cells. Although the sensitivity of HMWCK in clear cell lesions is low, with this unique paradoxical staining pattern and relatively high sensitivity in spindle cell lesions, HMWCK could be useful in diagnosing adenomyoepithelioma. In choosing immunohistochemical markers, any of the seven markers are useful, but combining HMWCK and any one of α-SMA, calponin, and p63 would be a good panel for the diagnosis of adenomyoepithelioma.

Indexed as

AdenomyoepitheliomaBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKeratinsBiomarkers, TumorKeratins

Identifiers

PMID25479938
OpenAlexW1980425848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.