Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25479933›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2014

[Pathogenesis and new therapeutic approaches for systemic lupus erythematosus].

K Tenbrock

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

K TenbrockKlinik für Kinder und Jugendmedizin, Abteilung Pädiatrische Rheumatologie, Division of Pediatric Pneumology, Allergology and Immunology, Klinikum der RWTH Aachen, RWTH Aachen, University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland, ktenbrock@ukaachen.de.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus is a complex autoimmune disease that can affect multiple organs and is characterized by a loss of peripheral tolerance against nuclear antigens, pathogenic B and T cell responses and production of autoantibodies. The prevalence is estimated to be 40 per 100,000 in the population in Europe but can be as high as 150 patients per 100,000 among the Afro-Caribbean population. Although the 5-year survival rate in the 1950s was estimated to be only 50%, the 10-year survival rate is currently estimated to be 70-92%. This progress is particularly due to a better understanding of the pathogenesis that opened up better therapeutic possibilities in the past and now raises new perspectives for future therapy approaches.

objectiveThe current knowledge on the pathogenesis and the current situation of new therapeutic approaches for SLE are presented. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This progress in the therapeutic options was made possible by a better understanding of the pathophysiology, which leads to the expectation of an improvement in the prognosis of patients due to reduction in the burden of the disease in the future. Several new therapeutic medications are currently awaiting approval and recently for the first time in more than 50 years a new medication for SLE was approved, a monoclonal antibody to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-like ligand, B-cell activating factor (BAFF) belonging to the TNF family also named B-cell lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), BAFF/BLyS.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalEvidence-Based MedicineHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsImmunotherapyLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMolecular Targeted TherapyAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID25479933
OpenAlexW114511710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.