ArticleDer Internist2015
[Reflex syncope and syncope secondary to orthostatic hypotension].
Article in Der Internist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReflex syncope predominantly occurs in younger patients and is the most common type of syncope. Typical contributors to reflex syncope are orthostatic stress, followed by a delayed and inadequate circulatory response consisting of bradycardia (cardioinhibitory type) and hypotension (vasodepressor type). Comparably, syncope may occur after direct activation of the vagus nerve, after emotional distress or pain, and in specific situations, such as coughing and post-micturition. The latter situations are mediated by indirect vagus nerve activation by usually unknown mediators. Syncope mediated by orthostatic hypotension occurs in elderly patients and is mediated by insufficient sympathoadrenergic vasoconstriction, occurring shortly after the onset of the orthostatic situation. DIAGNOSTICS: A thorough examination of the patient history is the mainstay of diagnostics. Specific testing is only required in uncertain and recurrent cases. In addition to standard diagnostics, tilt table testing can be helpful. A negative tilt test is, however, not definitive. Implanted loop recorders are helpful to diagnose the cardioinhibitory component of reflex syncope and are more sensitive than tilt testing. THERAPY: Treatment of both types of syncope consists of avoiding known situations leading to syncope, early reaction to prodromal syndromes, and physical counterpressure manoeuvers. Drug treatment (e.g. alpha-adrenergic agonists and fludrocortisone) are effective only in patients with orthostatic syncope. In selected patients with reflex syncope of a predominantly cardioinhibitory type, pacemaker implantation may be considered in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25479834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.